Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Russell, 477 N.W.2d 886.

119 citing documents.

Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children v. State of Minnesota, ... Minn. 2023
Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children v. State of Minnesota, ... Minn. 2023
But this holding amounts to closing our eyes to what history and modern reality have demonstrated to be true: Where racially segregated neighborhoods exist, the historical result has been racialized disparities in academic outcomes.5 n.2 (Minn. 1991) (explaining that courts “cannot and must not close our eyes when presented with evidence that certain laws, regardless of the purpose for which they were enacted, discriminate unfairly on the basis of race”).
Minn. 2023
See State v. Russell , –90 (Minn. 1991) (recognizing heightened rational basis review).
Minn. 2022
2(b)(4) (1990)); State v. Russell , (Minn. Stat. § 152.023 (1990)); (Minn. Stat. § 169.522 (1990)); (Minn. Stat. § 573.01 (1980)).
Court of Appeals Thissen, J. Concurring, Anderson, J., Gildea, C.J. Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Minn. 2020
Stacey Marable, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
As Marable’s claim is under the Minnesota Constitution, we must determine whether there is “a reasonable connection between the actual, and not just the theoretical, effec t of the challenged classification and the statutory goals.”
State v. Roy 920 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Roy 920 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Russell , , 888-89 (Minn. 1991) (requiring persons similarly situated be treated alike unless rational basis exists for discriminating between them).
State v. Holloway 916 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 2018
State v. Holloway 916 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 2018
In re Durand , , 784 (Minn. 2015) (quoting State v. Russell , , 889 (Minn. 1991) ).
Robert Atkinson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Freddie James Prewitt-Bey, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See 7 -89 (Minn. 1991) (applying a more stringent rational basis test to an equal protection challenge that alleges the legislature enacted a particular statute because of an anticipated racial discriminatory effect); (“A cla ssification that does not ad
In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Danna Rochelle Back v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Danna Rochelle Back v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
at 297, 299-301 (applying only Minnesota rational basis test and striking down statute based on violation of state equal protection clause, even though defendant challenged statute under both state and federal constitutions); -91 (Minn.1991) (same).
Janie "Jane" Astramecki v. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Janie "Jane" Astramecki v. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re GUARDIANSHIP and CONSERVATORSHIP OF Helen Louise DURAND, Ward/Protected Person 859 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 2015
In Re GUARDIANSHIP and CONSERVATORSHIP OF Helen Louise DURAND, Ward/Protected Person 859 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 2015
Although the phrase “equal protection” is not used, we have recognized that the Minnesota Constitution “embodies principles of equal protection synonymous to the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.” n.3 (Minn. 1991).
State v. Thiel 846 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Thiel 846 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The Minnesota Constitution does not contain an explicit equal-protection provision, but “our state constitution embodies principles of equal protection synonymous to the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.” , 889 n. 3 (Minn.1991).
Dean v. City of Winona 843 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Dean v. City of Winona 843 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
889 (Minn.1991) (holding that Minn.Stat.
State ex rel. Commissioner of Human Services v. Buchmann 830 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State ex rel. Commissioner of Human Services v. Buchmann 830 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Weir v. ACCRA Care, Inc. 828 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Weir v. ACCRA Care, Inc. 828 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Healthstar, -50 (discussing the difference between the Minnesota rational-basis test and the federal rational-basis test and concluding that the Minnesota rational-basis test applies); see also Kolton v. Cnty.
Healthstar Home Health, Inc. v. Jesson 827 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Healthstar Home Health, Inc. v. Jesson 827 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Fellegy 819 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Fellegy 819 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
220 (1886); City of Minneapolis v. Buschette, 307 Minn. 60, 64 , (confirming that equal protection is an “unenumer-ated” constitutional right found in the state constitution (quotation omitted)).
State v. Cox 798 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2011
State v. Cox 798 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2011
5 While we have not always followed federal law in interpreting our state Equal Protection Clause, we have relied on federal law to determine if two groups are similarly situated, (explaining that the Equal Protection Clauses of both the United States and Minnesota Constitutions “have been analyzed under the same principles and begin with the ma
Hayes v. Commissioner of Public Safety 773 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Hayes v. Commissioner of Public Safety 773 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Murphy v. COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES 765 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Murphy v. COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES 765 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Minnesota, courts “have required a reasonable connection between the actual, and not just the theoretical, effect of the challenged classification and the statutory goals.”
State v. Peck 756 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Peck 756 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 755 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2008
Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 755 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2008
Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry 735 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2007
Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry 735 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2007
State v. Richmond 730 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Richmond 730 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Appellate courts are “ordinarily loathe to intrude or even inquire into the legislative process on matters of criminal punishment.” ( , 888 n. 2 (Minn.1991)).
Granville v. Minneapolis School District 716 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Granville v. Minneapolis School District 716 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
( (quoting Guilliams v. Comm’r of Revenue, )).
State v. Barnes 713 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 2006
State v. Barnes 713 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 2006