Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Linehan, 518 N.W.2d 609.
- In Re Irwin 529 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- In Re Irwin 529 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Matter of Kunshier 521 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Matter of Kunshier
521 N.W.2d 880
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(“[W]e [recently] determined that we should follow the Pearson definition.”) (citing Blodgett, ); see also C. Peter Erlinder, Minnesota’s Gulag: Involuntary Treatment for the “Politically III”, 19 Wm.
- In Re Bieganowski 520 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- In Re Bieganowski 520 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Matter of Schweninger 520 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Matter of Schweninger
520 N.W.2d 446
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In the companion case, the supreme court, noting that appellant’s criminal history met the first “habitual course of misconduct” element of the Pearson test, focused on the second and third elements: the “utter lack of power to control * * * sexual impulses”; *450 and, the likelihood the person will “attack or otherwise inflict