Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Murphy, 545 N.W.2d 909.
- State v. Adickes 741 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Adickes 741 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Suhon 742 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Kelley 734 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Kelley 734 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Engle 731 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Coughlin 731 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
State v. Coughlin
731 N.W.2d 862
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See, (discussing construction of statutes).
- State v. Engle 731 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- In Re the Welfare of D. W. 731 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- In Re the Welfare of D. W. 731 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Al-Naseer 721 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Al-Naseer 721 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Ulmer 719 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Ulmer 719 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Skipintheday 717 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 2006
- State v. Skipintheday 717 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 2006
- State v. Johnson 713 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Johnson 713 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Skapyak 702 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Skapyak 702 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Estrella 700 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Estrella 700 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Zeimet 696 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 2005
-
State v. Zeimet
696 N.W.2d 791
Minn. 2005
(applying de novo review to terroristic threats statute); d- 643, 646-47 (Minn.1981) (applying de novo review to district court’s interpretation of sentencing guidelines).
- State v. Gabbert 693 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Gabbert 693 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Blackowiak v. Mielke 692 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Blackowiak v. Mielke 692 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. White 692 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. White 692 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Banken 690 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Banken 690 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- In Re the Welfare of T.C.J. 689 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
In Re the Welfare of T.C.J.
689 N.W.2d 787
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
And the rules of statutory construction require that courts “give a reasonable and sensible construction to criminal statutes.”
- State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Tice 686 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Tice 686 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Duncan v. Commissioner of Public Safety 683 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Duncan v. Commissioner of Public Safety 683 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Johnson 679 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Johnson 679 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Heaney 676 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Heaney 676 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Bluhm 676 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 2004
- State v. Bluhm 676 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 2004
- State v. Nelson 671 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- State v. Nelson 671 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- State v. Wohlsol, Inc. 670 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 2003