Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Murphy, 545 N.W.2d 909.

251 citing documents.

State v. Wohlsol, Inc. 670 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(stating whether a statute has been properly construed is a question of law subject to de novo review); , 168 (Minn.App.1998), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State v. Kramer 668 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kramer 668 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Tracy 667 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Tracy 667 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Dominguez 663 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Dominguez 663 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Wukawitz 662 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2003
State v. Wukawitz 662 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2003
State v. Leja 660 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Leja 660 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Kastner v. Star Trails Ass'n 658 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State Ex Rel. Allen v. Fabian 658 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Kastner v. Star Trails Ass'n 658 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State Ex Rel. Allen v. Fabian 658 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. LORSUNG 658 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. LORSUNG 658 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Noggle 657 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Noggle 657 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Neal v. State 658 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 2003
Neal v. State 658 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 2003
State v. Soukup 656 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Soukup 656 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Anderson 654 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Anderson 654 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(reviewing statutory interpretation underlying dismissal for lack of probable cause); (holding that whether a statute has been properly construed is a question of law subject to de novo review).
State v. Coonrod 652 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Coonrod 652 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. KNAEBLE 652 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. KNAEBLE 652 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
1 (2000) (prohibiting threats made with purpose of terrorizing another or in reckless disregard of risk of causing such terror); (discussing elements of terroristic threats in context of claim that physical acts alone could not constitute terroristic threats).
State v. Larsen 650 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2002
State v. Larsen 650 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2002
State v. Koenig 649 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Koenig 649 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Jarvis 649 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Jarvis 649 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Hearn 647 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Hearn 647 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Colvin 645 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 2002
D.M.S. v. Barber 645 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 2002
State v. Colvin 645 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 2002
D.M.S. v. Barber 645 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 2002
State v. Morris 644 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Morris 644 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Misquadace 644 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2002
State v. Varner 643 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 2002
State v. Misquadace 644 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2002
State v. Varner 643 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 2002
In Re the Welfare of W.A.H. 642 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Welfare of W.A.H. 642 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Lewis 638 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2002