DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jones, 556 N.W.2d 903.

143 citing documents.

  • Distinguished State v. Hendry 636 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • In Re the Welfare of R.J.E. 630 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • In Re the Welfare of R.J.E. 630 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    (stating conviction may stand if erroneously admitted statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt).
  • In Re the Welfare of M.P.Y. 630 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 2001
  • In Re the Welfare of M.P.Y. 630 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 2001
    “If the verdict actually rendered was surely unattributable to the error, the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • Scales v. State 620 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2001
  • Scales v. State 620 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2001
    See id.; (holding that a claimed constitutional error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt where verdict was “surely unattributable” to the error) ().
  • State v. Walthers 620 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Walthers 620 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    intent for murder); (admitting testimony of defendant’s threats against the victim’s friends to show motive and intent); (allowing evidence of other robberies involving defendant to show relationship between the victim and defendant as motive for murder), , 909 n. 4 (Minn.1996).
  • State v. Bradford 618 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Bradford 618 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 2000
    An error is harmless “[i]f the verdict actually rendered was surely unattributable to the error, * *
  • State v. Young 610 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Young 610 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    *363 (citation omitted).
  • State v. Tovar 605 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Tovar 605 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2000
    see generally U.S. Const, amend.
  • State v. Bauer 598 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Shoen 598 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Shoen 598 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1999
    2078 ; (recognizing that with respect to constitutional errors in a criminal trial, the state bears the burden of showing the error was harmless); (recognizing that with respect to “presumptively prejudicial” errors, the state bears the burden of rebutting th
  • State v. Bauer 598 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1999
    An error is harmless, and reversal not required, “[i]f the verdict actually rendered was surely unattributable to the error.”
  • Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
  • Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Aubid 591 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Aubid 591 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Munson 594 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Munson 594 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Keeton 589 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Keeton 589 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Parker 585 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Parker 585 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1998
    (citing State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347, 353 , ).
  • State v. Soyke 585 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Soyke 585 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Shannon 583 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Shannon 583 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1998
    As we said recently in State v. Juarez, “[I]f the verdict actually rendered was surely unattributable to the error, the error is harmless beyond a reasonable *586 doubt,” ().
  • State v. Buggs 581 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Buggs 581 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1998
    A court, therefore, can neither inform a jury that a case must be decided, nor allow the jury to believe that a ‘deadlock’ is not an available option.” (citations omitted).
  • State v. Thompson 578 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Thompson 578 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1998
    In a harmless error analysis we are guided by the principal that the error will be deemed harmless beyond a reasonable doubt “[i]f the verdict actually rendered was surely unattributable to the error * * ().
  • State v. Shoen 578 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Shoen 578 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1998
    2078, 2081 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993)
  • State v. Juarez 572 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Juarez 572 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1997
    Roberts, 296 Minn. at 353 , d at 747
  • State v. Ashby 567 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Ashby 567 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1997
    If the verdict actually rendered was surely unattributable to the error, the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” (quoting Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279 , 113 S.Ct.