Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A., 556 N.W.2d 557.

26 citing documents.

Emily Pedersen, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A., d 557, 560 (Minn. 1996).
Mark A. VanGelder, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
see also Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A., (noting that negligence and breach of contract are “ two theories [that] will frequently be interchangeable in legal malpractice cases”).1 The factual allegations VanGelder pleaded in support of his breach-of-contract claim are identical to those he pleaded in support of his malpractice claim, w
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
As the district court noted, the letter caused the Lings considerable stress, but “[i]n general, extra-contractual damages, including those for emotional distress, are not recoverable for breach of contract.” Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A.
Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc., Minn. 2023
And we have recognized that “[t]he general policy of Minnesota is to encourage arbitration as a speedy, informal, and relatively inexpensive procedure for resolving controversies.” Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A.
Mary Jane Gross, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
This is so because of our supreme court’s concern that “claims of mental anguish may be speculative” and have the “potential for abuse of the judicial process.” Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A.
Kevin Scott Karsjens, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(holding that a plaintiff must “prove that emotional injury occurred under circumstances tending to guarantee its genuineness”) (quotation omitted).
Olimpia Onofre Cedillo, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Emotional -distress damages are available in attorney malpractice cases when there is “a direct violation of the plaintiff’s rights by willful, wanton or malicious conduct; mere negligence is not sufficient.”
Abdiaziz H. Hirsi, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Laila Jama, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jane Doe v. Kmart Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jane Doe v. Kmart Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2017
at 536; see also Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard, & Sween, d 557, 560 (Minn. 1990) (holding Minnesota allows recovery of emotional-distress damages in a tort case only “in limited circumstances”).
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 782 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 782 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard, (discussing tort damages in context of legal malpractice claim).
Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-Silverwood 670 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-Silverwood 670 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Arbitration is favored as a speedy, informal, and relatively inexpensive method for resolving controversies, Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A, but the district court “may stay an arbitration proceeding commenced or threatened on a showing that there is no agreement to arbitrate,” Minn.Stat.
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 652 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2002
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 652 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2002
* * ⅜ Thus, we have been careful to limit the availability of such damages to “those plaintiffs who prove that emotional injury occurred under circumstances tending to guarantee its genuineness.” Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A., (quoting Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., -38 (Minn. 1983)).
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See, e.g., Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A., WUd, 302 Minn, at 440, d at 789 ; Pillsbury Co. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins.
Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A. 594 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A. 594 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A., (stating that arbitration is a speedy and relatively inexpensive way to resolve controversies).
Deli v. University of Minnesota 578 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Deli v. University of Minnesota 578 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A., Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Cas.