Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. State, 553 N.W.2d 40.

102 citing documents.

Jonathan David Fritz, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Richard Joseph Terfehr v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District, Wilkin ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Richard Joseph Terfehr v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District, Wilkin ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A24-1910 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
We review de novo “[w]hether government entities and public officials are protected by statutory immunity [or] official immunity.”
A24-1331 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Whether government entities and public officials are protected by statutory immunity and official immunity is a legal question which this court reviews de novo.” LeBaron v. Minn. Bd.
Arianna Anderson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Whether government entities and public officials are protected by statutory immunity and official immunity is a legal question which this court reviews de novo.”
Wade S. Nukala, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Andrew Ellis, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
official immunity is a legal question which this court reviews de novo.”
William A. McClendon, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
David Brian Pemrick v. Lori Ann Bucher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
David Brian Pemrick v. Lori Ann Bucher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
N. States Power Co., d at 490; (quotation omitted), rev’d on other grounds
Jason Hoff v. Earl Surman 883 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Hoff v. Earl Surman 883 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Barbara Kuntz v. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Barbara Kuntz v. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Paul J. Krause v. City of Elk River Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Paul J. Krause v. City of Elk River Minn. Ct. App. 2015
official immunity is a legal question which this court reviews de novo.”
Lisa Miller v. Dan Marosok, Forest Lake Area High School d/b/a Independent School District 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lisa Miller v. Dan Marosok, Forest Lake Area High School d/b/a Independent School District 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Juan Edward Shariss v. City of Bloomington 852 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Juan Edward Shariss v. City of Bloomington 852 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
official immunity is a legal question which this court reviews de novo.”
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
the complaint is premised.’” (quoting 1 David F. Herr & Roger S. Haydock, 5 Minnesota Practice § 12.9, at 87 (Supp. 1995)), rev’d on other grounds
Nichols v. State, Office of the Secretary 842 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Nichols v. State, Office of the Secretary 842 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Curtis v. Klausler 802 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Curtis v. Klausler 802 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
Whether a person has a duty of care “is an issue for the court to determine as a matter of law.”
JW Ex Rel. BRW v. 287 INTER. DIST. 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
J.W. ex rel. B.R.W. v. 287 Intermediate District 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
JW Ex Rel. BRW v. 287 INTER. DIST. 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(official immunity); , 43-44 n. 1, 45 (Minn.1996) (official and *901 statutory immunity; also referred to as "discretionary immunity").
J.W. ex rel. B.R.W. v. 287 Intermediate District 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(official immunity); , 43-44 n. 1, 45 (Minn.1996) (official and *901 statutory immunity; also referred to as “discretionary immunity”).
Prokop v. Independent School Dist. No. 625 754 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Prokop v. Independent School Dist. No. 625 754 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Simmons v. Fabian 743 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Simmons v. Fabian 743 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Granville v. Minneapolis School District 716 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Granville v. Minneapolis School District 716 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Stuedemann v. Nose 713 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Stuedemann v. Nose 713 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(citing Restatement (Sec *84 ond) of Torts § 315 (1965)).
Meier v. City of Columbia Heights 686 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Meier v. City of Columbia Heights 686 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Fedke v. City of Chaska 685 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Fedke v. City of Chaska 685 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Sletten v. Ramsey County 675 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2004