Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Winkler v. Magnuson, 539 N.W.2d 821.

65 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Denial of Duty Death Benefits for Floyd Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Amy Sweasy Tamburino v. Michael O. Freeman, David Hough, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
at 321 (explaining that “a party can reasonably rely on a representation unless the falsity of 17 Although this was not the basis on which the district court dismissed the fraudulent- inducement claim, “summary judgment should be affirmed if it can be sustained on any ground.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
Tina Marie Lund, as conservator of the Honorable Fred Karasov v. Calhoun Orange, Inc. d/b/a Orange Theory Fitness … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Tina Marie Lund, as conservator of the Honorable Fred Karasov v. Calhoun Orange, Inc. d/b/a Orange Theory Fitness … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Paul, (stating a district court’s summary-judgment order may be affirmed if the decision is correct on other grounds).
John P. Norusis v. John Goodfellow, et al., Peter Reich, et al., Andrew Kramer, et al., Larry Whitaker … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(citation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
Mary Ellen Spinler, et al v. City of Brownsdale Minn. Ct. App. 2020
19, 2006); see, e.g., Winkler v. Magnuson , (addressing an “alternative theory presen ted to, but not ruled on by, the court below”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Paul Stepnes v. Beth Trautman, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[W]e may affirm a summary judgment if there are no genuine issues of material fact and if the decision is correct on other grounds .” Winkler v. Magnuson , ( review denied (Minn. Feb.
Jill M. Larsen v. Wells Fargo Bank NA Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“[W]e may affirm a summary judgment if there are no genuine issues of material fact and if the 23 decision is correct on other grounds.” (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Feb.
LaPlant Properties, Inc. v. State of Minnesota, City of Buffalo, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Timothy Boldt v. Mike’s Electrical Central MN, LLC, d/b/a Mike’s Electric Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Derby Construction v. Jade Lutzi Painting, LLC, Expert Insulation, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 821, 828 (Minn. App. 1995), review denied (Minn. Feb.
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“[S]ummary judgment should be affirmed if it can be sustained on any ground.”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Anibal Sanchez v. Dahlke Trailer Sales, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Anibal Sanchez v. Dahlke Trailer Sales, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Julie Strelow, et al v. Winona Steamboat Days Festival Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Julie Strelow, et al v. Winona Steamboat Days Festival Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This court may affirm summary judgment “if it can be sustained on any ground.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota by Lorie Afremov and Michael R. Afremov v. Anne L. Remes, et al., Martha W. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota by Lorie Afremov and Michael R. Afremov v. Anne L. Remes, et al., Martha W. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Souhsiung Jack Chiu v. Timbershore Home Owners’ Association and third party plaintiff, vs. New Horizon Homes, Inc., Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Souhsiung Jack Chiu v. Timbershore Home Owners’ Association and third party plaintiff, vs. New Horizon Homes, Inc., Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timbershore argues that summary judgment is appropriate because Chiu did not offer evidence that Timbershore “breached a standard of care with respect to the maintenance of the water pipe.” (stating that this court will affirm summary judgment “if it can be sustained on any ground”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-RP2 v. Timothy Knoedler, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-RP2 v. Timothy Knoedler, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Renee C. Kinzer, John Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Renee C. Kinzer, John Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Gregory B. Lindwall v. Country Preferred Insurance Company, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gregory B. Lindwall v. Country Preferred Insurance Company, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that “summary judgment should be affirmed if it can be sustained on any ground”), review denied (Feb.
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester 846 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester 846 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Even if the district court improperly weighed the evidence when reaching its conclusion, we will not reverse “if there are no genuine issues of material fact and if the decision is correct on other grounds.” (quotation omitted).
Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis 817 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 2012
Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis 817 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 2012
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 803 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 803 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-28 (Minn.App.1995), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Jane Doe 43C v. Diocese of New Ulm 787 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Jane Doe 43C v. Diocese of New Ulm 787 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Because summary judgment will be affirmed if it can be sustained on any ground, review denied (Minn. Feb.
Hebert v. CITY OF FIFTY LAKES 784 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Hebert v. CITY OF FIFTY LAKES 784 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Presbrey v. James 781 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Presbrey v. James 781 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLC 775 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLC 775 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc. 716 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc. 716 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
See, review denied (Minn. Feb.
Horton v. Township of Helen 624 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Horton v. Township of Helen 624 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Goins v. West Group 619 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2000

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by