Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Disciplinary Action Against Randall, 562 N.W.2d 679.
- Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam Concurring, Thissen, J. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Ignatius Chukwuemeka Udeani, a … Minn. 2023
-
Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam
Minn. 2022
When assessing harm from disciplinary violations, we consider “ ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’ ” 308 (Minn. 2011) ().
-
Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam
Minn. 2020
But, when assessing harm, we also consider “ ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’ ” (alteration in original) ().
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Stewart 899 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2017
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Saltzstein 896 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 2017
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Saltzstein
896 N.W.2d 864
Minn. 2017
In evaluating harm to the public, we consider “ ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’ ” ().
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Pearson 888 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 2016
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Pearson
888 N.W.2d 319
Minn. 2016
In evaluating harm to the public, we consider “the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.” () (internal quotation marks omitted).
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Paul Roland RAMBOW, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0169389 874 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 2016
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Paul Roland RAMBOW, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0169389 874 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 2016
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Christopher Robert WALSH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 199813 872 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 2015
-
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Christopher Robert WALSH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 199813
872 N.W.2d 741
Minn. 2015
See Coleman, d at 308 (determining that “[t]he impact of the harm to the public and the legal profession requires consideration of ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries’ ” ()); (determining that the failure to follow court rules undermines public confidence in the legal system).
- In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William Bernard BUTLER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 227912 868 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 2015
-
In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William Bernard BUTLER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 227912
868 N.W.2d 243
Minn. 2015
In doing so, we examine “ ‘the number of clients harmed 13 [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’ ” Coleman, d at 308 ().
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Dale Allen HANSEN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 217840 868 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 2015
-
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Dale Allen HANSEN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 217840
868 N.W.2d 55
Minn. 2015
Next, assessing the harm to the public and the legal profession “requires consideration of ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’ ” (alteration in original) ().
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William L. FRENCH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 131945 864 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 2015
-
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William L. FRENCH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 131945
864 N.W.2d 183
Minn. 2015
Assessing the harm to the public and the legal profession “requires consideration of ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’ ” Coleman, d at 308 (alteration in original) ().
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Jaeger 834 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 2013
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Jaeger
834 N.W.2d 705
Minn. 2013
In analyzing these factors, we consider “ ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’ ” (alteration in original) ().
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Fru 829 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2013
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Fru
829 N.W.2d 379
Minn. 2013
C. Harm to the Public and Legal Profession In assessing the harm that Fru’s misconduct caused to the public and the legal profession, we consider “ ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’ ” ().
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Rymanowski 809 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 2012
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Rymanowski
809 N.W.2d 217
Minn. 2012
Harm to the Public and Legal Profession When determining whether an attorney's misconduct harmed the public and legal profession, we consider " 'the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients' injuries"" ().
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Ulanowski 800 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 2011
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Ulanowski
800 N.W.2d 785
Minn. 2011
Harm to the Public and the Legal Profession We have said that “[t]he impact of the harm to the public and the profession [from professional misconduct] requires consideration of ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’” Coleman, d at 308 ().
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Swokowski 796 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 2011
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Swokowski
796 N.W.2d 317
Minn. 2011
Harm to the Public and the Legal Profession In evaluating the impact of the harm caused by professional misconduct to the public and the profession, we consider “ ‘the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.’” , (Minn.2011) ().
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Coleman 793 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 2011
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Coleman
793 N.W.2d 296
Minn. 2011
B. Harm to the Public and to the Legal Profession The impact of the harm to the public and the profession requires consideration of “the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.”
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Selmer 749 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 2008
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Selmer
749 N.W.2d 30
Minn. 2008
This includes facts such as “the number of clients harmed [and] the extent of the clients’ injuries.”
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Keller 656 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 2003
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Keller
656 N.W.2d 398
Minn. 2003
1 *402 “Disbarment is the usual discipline for attorney misappropriation of client funds except in instances when the attorney presents clear and convincing evidence of substantial mitigating circumstances which show that the attorney did not intentionally convert the funds.” -84 (Minn.1997)
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Samborski 644 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 2002
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Samborski 644 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 2002
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Graham 609 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 2000
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Graham 609 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 2000
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Terrazas 581 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1998
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Terrazas 581 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1998