Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bradford, 618 N.W.2d 782.

115 citing documents.

Pierson v. State 637 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 2002
This court affords “great deference to a district court’s findings of fact and will not reverse the find *577 ings unless they are clearly erroneous.” Dukes, d at 251
State v. Hannon 636 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2001
State v. Hannon 636 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2001
Risk, d at 648-49 ; -96 (Minn.2000) (reaffirming Robinson).
State v. Kua Vang 636 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Kua Vang 636 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Ture 632 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 2001
State v. Ture 632 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 2001
State v. Rochefort 631 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 2001
State v. Rochefort 631 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 2001
IV; Minn. Const. Art. I, § 10
State v. Crowsbreast 629 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2001
State v. Crowsbreast 629 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2001
As we recently held in State v. Bradford, “[wjhile domestic abuse murder only requires extreme indifference, it does not preclude the possibility that a higher level of intent may be present.”
Dukes v. State 621 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2001
Dukes v. State 621 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2001
State v. Rochefort 619 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Rochefort 619 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
IV; Minn. Const. Art. I, § 10