Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele, 621 N.W.2d 758.

85 citing documents.

In re the Marria ge of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“For the purposes of reopening a dissolution judgment, the moving party bears the burden of proof.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(remanding attorney-fee issue because court made only “general findings”); d 758, 767 (Minn. App. 2001) (“The district court did not make findings sufficient to show what combination of need [supports] the entire award.
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
service, for a total of 90 years and was therefore eligible to retire and eligible for the ‘Rule of 90’ benefits.” There was no motion before the district court to award wife an additional $20,000 distribution from husband’s dividend account because he reached the “Rule of 90.” “Due process requires that a hearing be “‘fair, practicable, and reasonable.’” (citation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Ruth Sela v. Amit Yitzhak Sela Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Ruth Sela v. Amit Yitzhak Sela Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We note that while neither party bears an affirmative burden of proof in a division of martial property, the division is still “made on the evidence submitted by both parties.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(noting that remand is necessary when “[w]e cannot discern .
Thomas Joseph Daley v. Anne Elizabeth Daley, n/k/a Anne E. Patrick-Daley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thomas Joseph Daley v. Anne Elizabeth Daley, n/k/a Anne E. Patrick-Daley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(remanding attorney fee issue because court made only “general findings”); d 758, 767 (Minn. App. 2001) (“The district court did not make findings sufficient to show what combination of need [supports] the entire award.
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Anita Joan Rakow v. Gary Arnold Rakow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Anita Joan Rakow v. Gary Arnold Rakow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
And “[d]istrict courts are vested with broad discretion to determine whether to reserve maintenance.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Brian Leon Boucher v. Xiuwen Li Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Brian Leon Boucher v. Xiuwen Li Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“We will not reverse a district court’s decision to deny a removal motion absent an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Heather Santilli Gamble v. John Stebbins Gamble Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Heather Santilli Gamble v. John Stebbins Gamble Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 758, 762 (Minn. App. 2001) (listing duress as a basis for reopening a judgment), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re Guardianship of Pates 823 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re Guardianship of Pates 823 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(“Where evidence relevant to a factual issue consists of conflicting testimony, the district court’s decision is necessarily based on the credibility of the witnesses.”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Alam v. Chowdhury 764 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Alam v. Chowdhury 764 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 739 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
§ 549.21 (1990); (removal of judge rests within district court’s discretion); , 193 n. 2 (Minn.App.1986) (rejecting appellant’s argument to assigning different judge on remand).
Marriage of Clark v. Clark 642 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Clark v. Clark 642 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
review denied (Minn. Feb.
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 624 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 624 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(remanding fee issue, stating lack of findings “preclude[d] effective review” of fee award where district court awarded need-based and conduct-based attorney fees under Minn.Stat.