Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele, 621 N.W.2d 758.

85 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- 9 64 (Minn. App. 2001) (acknowledging that district courts are afforded broad discretion in addressing credibility because they are in the best position to determine which witnesses are credible and to weigh evidence when addressing factual issues with conflicting testimony), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
James A. Nilsson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Generally, we defer to a district court’s credibility determinations because the district court is “in the best position to determine which witnesses are credible and to weigh the evidence.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Ronald E. Roehrs Trust Dated August 9, 1999. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of: Amy Lynn Iverson v. Deven Allen Vanhouse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of: Amy Lynn Iverson v. Deven Allen Vanhouse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court generally has broad discretion in its decisions regarding spousal maintenance[,]” including whether to reserve maintenance, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-64 (Minn. App. 2001), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Trust of the Thomas Karakash Family Trust and the Ann Karakash Family Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Michael Larson v. Julie Christine Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Michael Larson v. Julie Christine Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Robert Thomas Nord, A v. Katherine Elizabeth Bowers, B, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Robert Thomas Nord, A v. Katherine Elizabeth Bowers, B, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, Respondent,... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, Respondent,... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Rebecca Lynn Fideldy, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will not reverse a district court’s decision to deny a removal motion absent an abuse of discretion.” Haefele v. Haefele , rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Matthew Beland, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Michael Robert Jacobson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Mother contends that caselaw supports her argument that “[w]hen a court combines different issues in a hearing and is unclear about what it is doing, that violates due process.” See, (determining that a district court’s midhearing “decision to combine reopening [of the dissolution judgment] and property division proceedings into one evidentiary hearing” violated due process when that combination “confused burdens of proof and thereby prejudiced appellant”), rev. denied (
In re the Marriage of: Christine Marie Salvosa, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
2.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
Morex Properties, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
To succeed on a for-cause removal motion, a party must make “a showing of affirmative [bias or] prejudice.” Haefele v. Haefele , rev. denied (Minn. Fe b. 21, 2001) .
A21-1725 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“For the purposes of reopening a dissolution judgment, the moving party bears the burden of proof.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Clark Donald Kaml, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Michaela Dojcinovic Bachmayer, NKA Michaela Dojcinovic, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(“To justify the reversal of a refusal to make amended findings, it is not enough to show that there was evidence to justify the proposed amended findings had they been made.”); (stating that appellate courts defer to the district court’s credibility determinations), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Donald Wayne Leeke, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We defer to this credibility determination.”); (“Where evidence relevant to a factu al issue consists of conflicting testimony, the district court’s decision is necessarily based on the credibility of the witnesses.
Megan Marie Johnson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(stating that due process requires a hearing to be fair, practicable, and reasonable), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Bobbi Jean Suhonen, n/k/a Bobbi Jean Lindsay, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“For the purposes of reopening a dissolution judgment, the moving party bears the burden of proof.”), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Anne Kiberu-Kalema, n/k/a/ Brenda Anne Kiberu, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 758, 765 (Minn. App. 2001), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Haefele v. Haefele , (M inn.
In re the Marriage of: John Gordon Lewis, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Haefele v. Haefele , , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Kristine Ann Spratt Hansen, n/k/a Kristine Ann Spratt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Haefele v. Haefele , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Francis Stephen Gill, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
reviewed de novo.”); review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the matter of: Eric Thurman Clinton, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Cynthia A. Linnerooth, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In evaluating whether husband was able to meet his needs independently, the district court determin ed that husband will receive $1,997.56 monthly, but found his claimed monthly expenses of $2,399 “troubl[ing]” and not “credible.” (stating that we give due deference to a district court’s evaluation of evidence, because it is in the best position to weigh evidence and make credibility determinations), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Warren Rupp, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Tiedke, nka Kathleen Marie Freitag, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Haefele v. Haefele , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Denise Marie Kienholz, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“For the purposes of reopening a dissolution judgment, the moving party bears the burden of proof.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
A18-1065 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that due process requires that a hearing be fair, practicable, and r easonable), review denied 14 (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Casey Alena Holloway, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that a district court’s award of attorney fees will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Deann Kay Wells, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(stating that a district court’s award of attorney fees will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Terry Anne Boggs, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Praveen Prabhakaran, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Estate of: Prince Rogers Nelson, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Bradley Jude Domagala, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Donald Wayne Leeke, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Haefele v. Haefele , d 758, 761 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Matter of: J. S. S., petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Bridget Kathleen Corrigan, f/k/a Bridget Kathleen Schmidt v. Daniel Thomas Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Bridget Kathleen Corrigan, f/k/a Bridget Kathleen Schmidt v. Daniel Thomas Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marria ge of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016