Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele, 621 N.W.2d 758.

85 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Lori Ann Chang v. Peter Alan Chang Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- 9 64 (Minn. App. 2001) (acknowledging that district courts are afforded broad discretion in addressing credibility because they are in the best position to determine which witnesses are credible and to weigh evidence when addressing factual issues with conflicting testimony), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
James A. Nilsson v. Jeannie Ball, Jennifer Jean Ball Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Generally, we defer to a district court’s credibility determinations because the district court is “in the best position to determine which witnesses are credible and to weigh the evidence.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Ronald E. Roehrs Trust Dated August 9, 1999 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of: Amy Lynn Iverson v. Deven Allen Vanhouse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of: Amy Lynn Iverson v. Deven Allen Vanhouse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Justin Benjamin Merritt v. Virginia Witherspoon Merritt Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court generally has broad discretion in its decisions regarding spousal maintenance[,]” including whether to reserve maintenance, rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: John Andrew Sinnott v. Kelli Anne Sinnott, n/k/a Kelli Anne Erickson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-64 (Minn. App. 2001), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Trust of the Thomas Karakash Family Trust and the Ann Karakash Family Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Amanda Marie-Gladys Johnson v. Joseph Lyle Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Matter of: Allan Hassan Taylor v. Kali Beth Kimbrell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Michael Larson v. Julie Christine Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Michael Larson v. Julie Christine Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Robert Thomas Nord A v. Katherine Elizabeth Bowers B Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Robert Thomas Nord A v. Katherine Elizabeth Bowers B Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, Itasca County Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, Itasca County Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Rebecca Lynn Fideldy v. Rose Marie Schumacher Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We will not reverse a district court’s decision to deny a removal motion absent an abuse of discretion.” Haefele v. Haefele , rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Matthew Beland, et al v. Heidi Beland NKA Heidi Rylander, Polk County Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Michael Robert Jacobson v. Dunja Vukosavovic Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Shawn Michael Filosi v. Ryann Theresa Christensen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Mother contends that caselaw supports her argument that “[w]hen a court combines different issues in a hearing and is unclear about what it is doing, that violates due process.” See, (determining that a district court’s midhearing “decision to combine reopening [of the dissolution judgment] and property division proceedings into one evidentiary hearing” violated due process when that combination “confused burdens of proof and thereby prejudiced appellant”), rev. denied (
In re the Marriage of: Christine Marie Salvosa v. Alan Douglas Salvosa Minn. Ct. App. 2023
2.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
Morex Properties, LLC v. Sauro & Bergstrom, PLLC, Warner Law Office, AllenMax Construction, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2023
To succeed on a for-cause removal motion, a party must make “a showing of affirmative [bias or] prejudice.” Haefele v. Haefele , rev. denied (Minn. Fe b. 21, 2001) .
In re the Marriage of: Whitney Ariane Blessing (A21-1709) (A21-1725) v. Andrew David Blessing (A21-1709) (A21-1725) Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“For the purposes of reopening a dissolution judgment, the moving party bears the burden of proof.” rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Clark Donald Kaml v. Shannon Marie Skarphol-Kaml Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Michaela Dojcinovic Bachmayer, NKA Michaela Dojcinovic v. Kyle Dalke Bachmayer Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(“To justify the reversal of a refusal to make amended findings, it is not enough to show that there was evidence to justify the proposed amended findings had they been made.”); (stating that appellate courts defer to the district court’s credibility determinations), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Donald Wayne Leeke v. Susan Lynn Webb Leeke, n/k/a Susan Lynn Leeke Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We defer to this credibility determination.”); (“Where evidence relevant to a factu al issue consists of conflicting testimony, the district court’s decision is necessarily based on the credibility of the witnesses.
Megan Marie Johnson v. Richard Preston Blackwell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(stating that due process requires a hearing to be fair, practicable, and reasonable), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Bobbi Jean Suhonen, n/k/a Bobbi Jean Lindsay v. Robert Thomas Suhonen Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“For the purposes of reopening a dissolution judgment, the moving party bears the burden of proof.”), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Anne Kiberu-Kalema, n/k/a/ Brenda Anne Kiberu v. Kizito David Kalema Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 758, 765 (Minn. App. 2001), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Knewtson, n/k/a Nicole Marie Campbell v. Adam Christopher Knewtson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Haefele v. Haefele , (M inn.
In re the Marriage of: John Gordon Lewis v. Elizabeth Ann Lewis Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Haefele v. Haefele , , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Kristine Ann Spratt Hansen, n/k/a Kristine Ann Spratt v. Christopher Patrick Hansen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Haefele v. Haefele , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Francis Stephen Gill v. Gretchen Zwakman Gill Minn. Ct. App. 2020
reviewed de novo.”); review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the matter of: Eric Thurman Clinton v. Gabriela Kathleen Linder Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Cynthia A. Linnerooth v. Gerald R. Linnerooth Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In evaluating whether husband was able to meet his needs independently, the district court determin ed that husband will receive $1,997.56 monthly, but found his claimed monthly expenses of $2,399 “troubl[ing]” and not “credible.” (stating that we give due deference to a district court’s evaluation of evidence, because it is in the best position to weigh evidence and make credibility determinations), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Warren Rupp v. Elisabeth Hastings Felten, f/k/a Elisabeth Hastings Felten Rupp Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Tiedke, nka Kathleen Marie Freitag v. Alex Lee Tiedke Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Haefele v. Haefele , review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Denise Marie Kienholz v. Douglas Floyd Kienholz Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“For the purposes of reopening a dissolution judgment, the moving party bears the burden of proof.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
In Re the Marriage of: Donald M. Charlson (A18-1058) (A18-1065) v. Angela K. Charlson (A18-1058) (A18-1065) Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that due process requires that a hearing be fair, practicable, and r easonable), review denied 14 (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Casey Alena Holloway v. Kent Bradford Holloway Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that a district court’s award of attorney fees will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Deann Kay Wells v. Joseph Daniel Wells, III Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(stating that a district court’s award of attorney fees will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Terry Anne Boggs v. David Carl Boggs Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Praveen Prabhakaran v. Vadivazhaghi Kannan Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Estate of: Prince Rogers Nelson, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Bradley Jude Domagala v. Laura Lynn Domagala Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Donald Wayne Leeke v. Susan Lynn Webb Leeke n/k/a Susan Lynn Leeke Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Haefele v. Haefele , d 758, 761 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Matter of: J. S. S v. G. I. S Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Bridget Kathleen Corrigan, f/k/a Bridget Kathleen Schmidt v. Daniel Thomas Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Bridget Kathleen Corrigan, f/k/a Bridget Kathleen Schmidt v. Daniel Thomas Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by