Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gibson v. Coldwell Banker Burnet, 659 N.W.2d 782.

23 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Guy Israel Greene. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Lorob Properties LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
2(3), 3.10 Sanctions “should not be imposed when an attorney has an ‘objectively reasonable basis for pursuing a factual or legal claim or when a competent attorney could form a reasonable belief [that] a pleading is well-grounded’ in fact and law.” ().
Jacques Lafrenier, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Appeal from the Findings and Order Redetermining Benefits of Otter Tail County Ditch No. 52. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Albany Ready Mix, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the SUPERVISED Estate of Nancy Eileen Flatgard, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
But sanctions “should not be imposed when an attorney has an objectively reasonable basis for pursuing a factual or legal claim or when a competent attorney could form a reasonable belief that a pleading is well-grounded in fact and law.” (quotation omitted).
Godfrey Muturi Simba v. Jacqueline Wangeshi Nwachukwu Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Godfrey Muturi Simba v. Jacqueline Wangeshi Nwachukwu Minn. Ct. App. 2024
If the party seeking sanctions does not comply with the safe-harbor procedures, “the motion for sanctions must be rejected.”
In re the Margaret A. Flolid Trust Agreement Dated December 12, 1994. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
9 Coldwell Banker Burnet, (quotation omitted).
Allstate Indemnity Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Gail R. Trotta v. Duluth Realty Company, Randy Underthun Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gail R. Trotta v. Duluth Realty Company, Randy Underthun Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, e.g., id.; 5 Progressive Ins., d at 874; d 782, 791 (Minn. App. 2003).
Guava LLC, Michael Dugas v. Spencer Merkel, Qwest Communications Corporation, Respondents,John Doe 173.23.48.174, John Doe 24.111.103.45, John Doe … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Guava LLC, Michael Dugas v. Spencer Merkel, Qwest Communications Corporation, Respondents,John Doe 173.23.48.174, John Doe 24.111.103.45, John Doe … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, (explaining that, under Minn. R. Civ.
Buscher v. MONTAG DEVELOPMENT, INC. 770 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Buscher v. MONTAG DEVELOPMENT, INC. 770 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Francis v. State 729 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2007
Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. Johnson 726 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. Johnson 726 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
P. 11.03(a)(1) “independently requires that a party seeking sanctions serve its motion on the non-moving party, wait for 21 days, and, if the challenged material has not been withdrawn or corrected by then, file the motion for sanctions in the district court.”
In Re the Claims for No-Fault Benefits Against Progressive Insurance Co. 720 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Claims for No-Fault Benefits Against Progressive Insurance Co. 720 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
A district court abuses its discretion if it imposes sanctions when the moving party has not complied with the so-called “safe-harbor provision” “because the offending party is unable to withdraw the improper papers or otherwise rectify the situation.” (quotation omitted).
Gibson v. Trustees of the Minnesota State Basic Building Trades Fringe Benefits Funds 703 N.W.2d 864 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Gibson v. Trustees of the Minnesota State Basic Building Trades Fringe Benefits Funds 703 N.W.2d 864 Minn. Ct. App. 2005