Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., 666 N.W.2d 320.

52 citing documents.

Jeffrey H Landon, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“The primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
A25-1555 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Our “primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Peggy Flaig, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
August Ventures, LLC v. Gedney Foods Company Minn. Ct. App. 2024
August Ventures, LLC v. Gedney Foods Company Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Katie Howard, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[T]he primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[T]he primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the in tent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Minn. 2022
This approach is consistent with our view that “the primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., Valspar Refinish, d at 364.
State of Minnesota, Minnesota Judicial Branch, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
When interpreting a contract, a court cannot ascertain the parties’ intent “by a process of dissection in which words or phrases are isolated from their context.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., (quotation omitted).
James Russell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“[T]he primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
BDS Laundry Management Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Accordingly, our goal in interpreting a contract “is to determine and enforce the in tent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Travis Colsen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
ut words in a contract are not to be viewed in isolati on, and “intent is ascertained, not by a process of dissection in which words or phrases are is olated from their context, but rather from a process of synthesis in which the words an d phrases are given a meaning in accordance with the obvious purpose of the contract as a whole.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Minn. 2021
D-2 “[T]he primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Robert L. Meller, Jr., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc. 913 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 2018
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc. 913 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 2018
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc. , , 323 (Minn. 2003).
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[T]he primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Todd Johnson v. Britta K. Anderson, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donnabelle M. Johnson, decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Todd Johnson v. Britta K. Anderson, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donnabelle M. Johnson, decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[T]he primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Singh Hospitality, Inc. v. North American Partners, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Singh Hospitality, Inc. v. North American Partners, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
4 “[T]he primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Wolf, Rohr, Gemberling & Allen, P. A. v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Wolf, Rohr, Gemberling & Allen, P. A. v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[T]he primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
David Waterworth v. Elaine Ekman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David Waterworth v. Elaine Ekman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., the supreme court stated, “Where the parties express their intent in unambiguous words .
Liza A. Robson, Trustee of The Ann S. Fischer Living Trust u/d/t February 2, 1995 v. The Economic … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Liza A. Robson, Trustee of The Ann S. Fischer Living Trust u/d/t February 2, 1995 v. The Economic … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2013
Savela v. City of Duluth 806 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 2011
Starlite Ltd. Partnership v. Landry's Restaurants, Inc. 780 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Starlite Ltd. Partnership v. Landry's Restaurants, Inc. 780 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., , 323 n. 1 (Minn.2003).
American National Bank of Minnesota v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Brainerd 773 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
American National Bank of Minnesota v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Brainerd 773 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“[T]he primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc. 764 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc. 764 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
In Re the Petition of Crablex, Inc. 762 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Petition of Crablex, Inc. 762 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., , 323 n. 1 (Minn.2003).
Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. 754 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. 754 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., , 323 n. 1 (Minn.2003).
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., , 323 n. 1 (Minn.2003).
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP v. Grossman 749 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP v. Grossman 749 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Superior Construction Services, Inc. v. Belton 749 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Superior Construction Services, Inc. v. Belton 749 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., , 323 n. 1 (Minn.2003).
Paradigm Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfield National Insurance Co. 738 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Paradigm Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfield National Insurance Co. 738 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“[T]he primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the intent of the parties.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc., v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.
Isaacs v. American Iron & Steel Co. 690 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Isaacs v. American Iron & Steel Co. 690 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
as a whole.” Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., (alteration in original) (quoting Republic Nat’l Life Ins.