Cited by

12 also forbids “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” State v. Clark , (quoting State v. Jackson , ).

But because section 609.04 “bars multiple conviction s under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident,” we remand for the district c ourt to exercise its discretion in determining which one of appellant’s criminal-sexual-conduct convictions to vacate and for resentencing.

(4) A crime necessarily proved if the crime charged were proved.” We have held that section 609.04 forbids “ multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” Clark, d at 170 ().

The supreme court has interpreted section 609.04 to “bar[] multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” (citing cases); -54 (Minn. App. 2009), review denied (Minn. Aug.

We have consistently he ld that Minn. Stat. § 6 09.04 (2016) “b ars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” State v. Jackson

Section 609.04 has been interpreted to bar “multiple convictions u nder different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

Minnesota courts have also held that Minn. Stat. § 609.04 “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” (“If the lesser offense is a lesser degree .

See Hackler, d at 559; (“[S]ection 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”).

“[S]ection 609.04 bars multip le convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” (footnote omitted).

d 758, 760 n.4 (Minn. 1985).

The statute also forbids “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

The Minnesota Supreme Court has interpreted section 609.04 to “bar[] multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

1 (2012) provides: “Upon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either the crime charged or an included offense, but not both.” This statute “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

We conclude that it was error for the district court to enter conviction on count 1.3 Minn. Stat. § 609.04 (2012) “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

The statute also forbids “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

-55 (Minn. 1978) (holding that convictions for similar offenses with different elements arising out of same conduct was proper).

1(4), defines an included offense as “[a] crime necessarily proved if the crime charged were proved.” Minn. Stat. § 609.04 also “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

Section 609.04 also forbids “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” (stating that where two convictions arising out of a single behavioral incident are formally adjudicated, section 609.04 should be applied to vacate one of the formally adjudicated convictions).

2 (2014) provides that “[a] conviction or acquittal of a crime is a bar to further prosecution of any included offense, or other degree of the same crime.” The statute “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

“[S]ection 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

1 (2012), states that “[u]pon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either the crime charged or an included offense, but not both.” Minn. Stat. § 609.04 also “bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

The supreme court “ha[s] consistently held that section 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

Minn. Stat. § 609.04 (2014) also forbids “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” State v. 8 Jackson

“[S]ection 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”

This sentencing is in violation of section 609.04, which prohibits ‘“multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.’” Clark, d at 170 ().

of a crime is a bar to further prosecution of any included offense, or other degree of the same crime.” (ruling that section 609.04 prohibits “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident”).

Appellate courts “have consistently held that [Minn. Stat. §] 609.04 bars multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.” -27 (Minn. App. 1997), review denied (Minn. May 28, 1997) (prohibiting multiple convictions for violating multiple provisions of a statute by commission of a single criminal act).

(stating that section 609.04, which addresses lesser-included offenses, “expressly prohibits multiple convictions which might not be prohibited by the [federal] Double Jeopardy Clause”); State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 399-400 , (discussing section 609.035 and concluding th

Nonetheless, section 609.04 forbids “multiple convictions under different sections of a criminal statute for acts committed during a single behavioral incident.”