Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jackson, 363 N.W.2d 758.

114 citing documents.

  • State v. Secrest 437 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Secrest 437 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    21, 1986) ( aff 'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, ).
  • State v. Mitjans 408 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Mitjans 408 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1987
    section 609.04 *835 gives broader protection to criminal defendants than that provided by the United States Supreme Court in its interpretations of the federal double jeopardy clause.
  • Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    the supreme court noted the broad protections of Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Gelhar 392 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Gelhar 392 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Chidester 380 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Chidester 380 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds
  • State v. Olson 372 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Olson 372 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    aff’d in part, rev’d in part, (outlining *814 tests to determine when Minn.Stat.