Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jackson, 363 N.W.2d 758.
- State v. Secrest 437 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
State v. Secrest
437 N.W.2d 683
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
21, 1986) ( aff 'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, ).
- State v. Mitjans 408 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1987
-
State v. Mitjans
408 N.W.2d 824
Minn. 1987
section 609.04 *835 gives broader protection to criminal defendants than that provided by the United States Supreme Court in its interpretations of the federal double jeopardy clause.
- Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Walker v. State
394 N.W.2d 192
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the supreme court noted the broad protections of Minn.Stat.
- State v. Gelhar 392 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Gelhar 392 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Chidester 380 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Chidester
380 N.W.2d 595
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds
- State v. Olson 372 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Olson
372 N.W.2d 812
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
aff’d in part, rev’d in part, (outlining *814 tests to determine when Minn.Stat.