Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ortlepp, 363 N.W.2d 39.
- State v. Whiteside 400 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- In Re the Welfare of W.W.M. 400 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Whiteside 400 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Burns 394 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1986
-
State v. Burns
394 N.W.2d 495
Minn. 1986
(holding, inter alia, that the defendant was entitled to an omnibus hearing on the admission of exculpatory statements to the police but that failure to hold such a hearing was not a ground for relief on appeal because defense counsel acquiesced in deferring decision on the statements until the day of tria
- State v. Anderson 380 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Anderson 380 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Bellotti 383 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Bellotti
383 N.W.2d 308
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
1930, 1935 , 26 L.Ed.2d 489 (1970)
- State v. Gustafson 379 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1985
-
State v. Gustafson
379 N.W.2d 81
Minn. 1985
This exception, however, is used only when'the circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness are “particularly reliable.”
- State v. Soukup 376 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Soukup 376 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Lucas 372 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1985
-
State v. Lucas
372 N.W.2d 731
Minn. 1985
1930 , 26 L.Ed.2d 489 (1970)