Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., 370 N.W.2d 844.

72 citing documents.

A23-0484 Andrea Anderson v. Aitkin Pharmacy Services, LLC dba Thrifty White Pharmacy, George ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A23-0484 Andrea Anderson v. Aitkin Pharmacy Services, LLC dba Thrifty White Pharmacy, George ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Supreme Court held that an employer, a secular fitness club, was liable for employment discrimination under the MHRA even though the MHRA “as applied [in that case] infringe[d] upon sincerely held religious beliefs and impose[d] upon the free exercise thereof” because of “[t]he state’s overriding compelling interest of eliminating discrimination based upon sex, race, marital status, or religion.” appeal dismissed, 478 U.S. 1015 (1986).
A21-0403 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.
Bay Side Recycling Company LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State by McClure v. Sports and Health Club, Inc. , Carlson, d at 3 30-31.
In the Matter of the Application of Uniti Towers LLC for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.
Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-Delano 830 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 2013
Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-Delano 830 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 2013
"However, an objection to want of standing goes to the existence of a cause of action, is jurisdictional, and may be raised at any time.” State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co. 817 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Builders Ass'n v. City of St. Paul 819 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Builders Ass'n v. City of St. Paul 819 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.
Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co. 817 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.
JEM ACRES, LLC v. Bruno 764 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
JEM ACRES, LLC v. Bruno 764 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.
Doe v. Lutheran High School of Greater Minneapolis 702 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Doe v. Lutheran High School of Greater Minneapolis 702 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
As to the third factor, “the government has an overriding compelling interest in prohibiting discrimination in employment and public accommodation.” State by McClure v. Sports Health Club, Inc.
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 673 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 673 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See Hill-Murray Fed’ State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.
McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range Planning 628 N.W.2d 620 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range Planning 628 N.W.2d 620 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Substantial evidence is defined as: (1) more than a scintilla of evidence; (2) such that a reasonable mind might accept it as adequate to support a conclusion; or (3) more than “some evidence” and more than “any evidence.” State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., -49 (Minn.1985) (citation omitted).
Rivera v. Ramsey County 615 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Rivera v. Ramsey County 615 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State by McClure v. Sports and Health Club, Inc., In re Custody of E.A.Q.D.
Joel v. Wellman 551 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Joel v. Wellman 551 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, In re Implementation of Util.
Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 549 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1996
Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 549 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1996
McClure v. Sports & Health Club, , 854 n. 17 (Minn.1985) appeal dismissed, Sports & Health Club Inc. v. Minnesota, 478 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct.
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc. 532 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc. 532 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Cf. State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.
Geraci v. Eckankar 526 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Geraci v. Eckankar 526 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., State by Johnson v. Porter Farms, Inc.
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employee's Union, Local No. 320, Minneapolis v. County of McLeod 509 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employee's Union, Local No. 320, Minneapolis v. County of McLeod 509 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., , 854 n. 17 (Minn.1985).
Rasmussen v. Glass 498 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 494 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 494 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Sports and Health Club, Inc., appeal dismissed, 478 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct.
Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Representative Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray … 487 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1992
Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Representative Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray … 487 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1992
See State v. Sports and Health Club, Inc., appeal dismissed, 478 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct.
State, Department of Human Rights v. Hibbing Taconite Co. 482 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State, Department of Human Rights v. Hibbing Taconite Co. 482 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., (despite individual differences regarding allegations of charging parties, class certification proper when same theory of liability asserted against employer).
Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High School, Maplewood 471 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High School, Maplewood 471 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State by McClure v. Sports and Health Club, Inc.
Black v. Snyder 471 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Black v. Snyder 471 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
2017, 2034-35 , *719 76 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983); State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.
City of Lake Elmo v. City of Oakdale 468 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
City of Lake Elmo v. City of Oakdale 468 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Substantial evidence is defined as: (1) more than a scintilla of evidence; (2) such that a reasonable mind might accept it as adequate to support a conclusion; or (3) more than “some evidence” and more than “any evidence.” McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., -9 (Minn.1985).
State v. Hershberger 462 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1990
State v. Hershberger 462 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1990
This analysis is similar to that applied to the claim for religious freedom based jointly on federal and state constitutional protection in State v. Sports & Health Club
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. French 460 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 1990
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. French 460 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 1990
McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., appeal dismissed, 478 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct.
Kolstad v. Fairway Foods, Inc. 457 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Kolstad v. Fairway Foods, Inc. 457 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
§ 14.69 (1986); see State by McClure v. Sports & Health Club, , 854 n. 17 (Minn.1985) (an agency’s decision of law is reviewed de novo).