Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lopez, 379 N.W.2d 633.

21 citing documents.

Kayd Mohamed Falug, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
ort of th e motion contradicted statements made by the defendant at the plea hearing); (affirming district court’s denial of a defe ndant’s postsentence mo tion to withdraw his guilty plea where the defendant’s stated reasons in support of the motion contradicted statements made by the defe ndant at the plea hearing); State v. Lopez , (same), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See State v. Lopez , (noting that a presumption arises that the defendant has been adequately informed of the charges and consequences of the plea when the record shows he discussed the plea with his attorney).
Kelsey Anna Ballman, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(holding that an 11 -month delay in moving to withdraw a guilty plea was not timely) , review denied (Minn. Feb.
Leanne Starr, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Wayne Behrens, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Wayne Behrens, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(affirming denial of a motion to withdraw a plea based in part on the district court’s credibility determination that the defendant was adequately informed of his rights, despite the defendant’s contradictory statements made at the plea hearing and the plea-withdrawal hearing), review denied
State of Minnesota v. Charles Chuck Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Charles Chuck Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(motion untimely when brought eleven months after sentencing), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State v. Byron 683 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Byron 683 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. Feb.
James v. State 674 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
James v. State 674 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(stating that even if petition for postconviction relief was untimely, the court would consider whether withdrawal of the plea would cause prejudice to the prosecution “as a result of defendant’s untimely request to stand trial”) ( review denied (Minn. Feb.
Bolinger v. State 647 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Bolinger v. State 647 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Even if we considered the petition untimely, we must further consider what prejudice the granting of a petition to withdraw a guilty plea would cause the prosecution “as a result of defendant’s untimely request to stand trial.” (emphasis omitted) (quoting United States v. Russell, 686 F.2d 35, 39 (D.C.Cir.1982)), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State v. Jumping Eagle 602 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Jumping Eagle 602 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
3 (1998); review denied (Minn. Feb.
Berkow v. State 573 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Berkow v. State 573 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State v. Weisberg 473 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Weisberg 473 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1991