Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bulau v. Hector Plumbing and Heating Co., 402 N.W.2d 528.

33 citing documents.

James Aeshliman, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Aquila, d at 884 (natural-gas pipeline system); Olmanson v. LeSueur County , (golf-cart culvert); (crane with structures surrounding it); Bulau v. Hector Plumbing & Heating Co., -30 (Minn. 1987) (fireplace), superseded by statute , Minn. Stat. § 541.051, subd.
Paul King, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Bulau v. Hector Plumbing & Heating Co., (“[Respondent] had almost six months, .
Lietz v. Northern States Power Co. 718 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 2006
Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
See also Bulau v. Hector Plumbing & Heating Co., -31 (Minn.1987) (citing Calder but holding that then-effective version of Minn.Stat.
Allianz Insurance Co. v. PM Services of Eden Prairie, Inc. 691 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Allianz Insurance Co. v. PM Services of Eden Prairie, Inc. 691 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
29, 1991); -97 (Minn.1987) (electrical switchboards are an “improvement”); Bulau v. Hector Plumbing & Heating Co., -30 (Minn.1987) (treating fireplace as an “improvement”); Citizens Sec.
Fisher v. County of Rock 580 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Fisher v. County of Rock 580 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Sartori, d at 451 -52 (-97 (Minn.1987) (electrical cabinets treated as an "improvement”)); Bulau v. Hector Plumbing & Heating Co., -30 (Minn.1987) (fireplace treated as an "improvement”); Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St.
Griebel v. Andersen Corp. 489 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1992
Griebel v. Andersen Corp. 489 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1992
See, Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St.
Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Blomgren v. Marshall Management Services, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Bulau v. Hector Plumbing & Heating Co.
Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(flooding caused by defective septic system); (explosion caused by defective switchboard); Bulan v. Hector Plumbing & Heating Co., (fire caused by defective fireplace); (flooding caused by defective sewage system); (electric shock caused by defective transformer vault); (fl
Minnesota Landmarks v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 466 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Minnesota Landmarks v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 466 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp. 432 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1988
Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp. 432 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1988
-97 (Minn.1987) (electrical cabinets treated as an “improvement”); -30 (Minn.1987) (fireplace treated as an “improvement”); Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St.
O'Connor v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 424 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
O'Connor v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 424 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(fireplace held to be an improvement); (electrical cabinets held to be an improvement); (electrical systems components held to be an improvement); Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St.
Sherbrook Co. v. E & H Earth Movers, Inc. 419 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Sherbrook Co. v. E & H Earth Movers, Inc. 419 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(flooding caused by defective septic system); (explosion caused by defective switchboard); (fire caused by defective fireplace); (flooding caused by defective sewage system); (electric shock caused by defective transformer vault); (fl
Wittmer v. Ruegemer 419 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1988
Wittmer v. Ruegemer 419 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1988
Greenbrier Village Condominium Two Ass'n v. Keller Investment, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
GREENBRIER VILL. CONDO. 2 v. Keller Inv. 409 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
GREENBRIER VILL. CONDO. 2 v. Keller Inv. 409 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
the Minnesota Supreme Court cited with approval a decision of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals which interpreted the statute of limitations at issue here: Generally, a statute of limitation begins to run at the time of the negligent act.
Greenbrier Village Condominium Two Ass'n v. Keller Investment, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
the Minnesota Supreme Court cited with approval a decision of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals which interpreted the statute of limitations at issue here: Generally, a statute of limitation begins to run at the time of the negligent act.
Ocel v. City of Eagan 402 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 1987
Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. 402 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1987
Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. 402 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1987
This court held in Bulau v. Hector Plumbing & Heating, that the statute of limitations for contribution actions runs from the discovery of the defective and *797 unsafe condition.
Ocel v. City of Eagan 402 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 1987
This case raises the same main issue decided today in Bulau v. Hector Plumbing & Heating Company, namely: when does the 2-year statute of limitations begin to run on a contribution claim arising from a defective improvement to real estate?