Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Joon Kyu Kim, 398 N.W.2d 544.

292 citing documents.

State v. Wiherski 481 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Wiherski 481 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Ault 478 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Ault 478 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“Critical impact” is shown “where the lack of the suppressed evidence significantly reduces the likelihood of a successful prosecution.”
State v. Solheim 477 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Olson 478 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Solheim 477 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(in a pretrial appeal, this court will reverse only if state shows trial court erred and error will have critical impact on trial’s outcome).
State v. Olson 478 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State, City of St. Paul v. Lynch 477 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State, City of St. Paul v. Lynch 477 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Hookom 474 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Hookom 474 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Ciurleo 471 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Ciurleo 471 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Kessler 470 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Kessler 470 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
decision affirmed (Kim I), this court held that Rule 28.04, subd.
State v. Nielsen 467 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1991
State v. Nielsen 467 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1991
§ 634.26 (Supp.1989), providing for the admission of statistical probability evidence relating to DNA test results, on the use of statistical probability evidence in criminal trials.
State v. Ohrtman 466 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Ohrtman 466 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Albrecht 465 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Albrecht 465 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
ANALYSIS This court will reverse a pretrial order suppressing evidence only if the state can demonstrate clearly and unequivocally that the trial court erred and that “the error will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial.”
In Re the Welfare of R.A.V. 464 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1991
In Re the Welfare of R.A.V. 464 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1991
In order to prevail, the City must demonstrate “clearly and unequivocally, first, that the trial court erred in its judgment and, second, that unless reversed, the error will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial.” ().
State v. Dittel 464 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Dittel 464 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Kraushaar 459 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Kraushaar 459 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Stroud 459 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Stroud 459 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Doughty 456 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Doughty 456 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Kunz 457 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Kunz 457 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Barsness 473 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1990
State v. Barsness 473 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1990
and WHEREAS, this court finds that the appellant has not established that the trial court’s order will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals be, and the same is, reversed and the matter is remanded for immediate trial.
State v. Ronnebaum 449 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
State v. Ronnebaum 449 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
the suppression, if sustained, will have a critical impact; the dissent also argued that the suppression order was erroneous.
State v. Lieder 449 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Lieder 449 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Ronnebaum 446 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Ronnebaum 446 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
550 n. 10 (Minn.1987) (facts indicating critical impact should be set forth in detail).
State v. Barsness 446 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Barsness 446 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
ANALYSIS The state in a pretrial appeal must show that the order appealed from is clearly erroneous and “significantly reduces the likelihood of a successful prosecution.”
State v. Fenney 448 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1989
State v. Schwartz 447 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1989
State v. Fenney 448 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1989
The hearing record included, by stipulation
State v. Schwartz 447 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1989
In determining the extent of admissibility of scientific test results, is a trial court to rely on State v. [Joon Kyu] Kim, ?
Joon Kyu Kim v. State 434 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1989
Joon Kyu Kim v. State 434 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1989