Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Norregaard, 384 N.W.2d 449.

61 citing documents.

State v. Hawkins 511 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1994
State v. Kelly 504 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Kelly 504 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
The statute “prohibits multiple sentences, even concurrent sentences, for two or more offenses that were committed as part of a single behavioral incident.”
State v. Hartfield 459 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1990
State v. Hartfield 459 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1990
we said: In deciding whether two or more intentional crimes were part of a single behavioral incident, one must focus on the factors of time and place and also consider whether the segments of conduct involved were motivated by a desire to obtain a single criminal objection.
State v. Nunn 411 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Nunn 411 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Nunn 399 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Nunn 399 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(defendant could not be sentenced for aggravated robbery and third degree assault where robbery and assault occurred at the same time and place).
State v. Grose 387 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Grose 387 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
*189 State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 404