Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gjovik v. Strope, 401 N.W.2d 664.

96 citing documents.

Marriage of Prahl v. Prahl 627 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Prahl v. Prahl 627 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
A finding is clearly erroneous if the reviewing court is “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 622 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Findings of fact are clearly erroneous only if the reviewing court is “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (citation omitted).
City of Golden Valley v. One 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix, Vin 1g2wp521wf309530, Pennsylvania License Plate P520111 616 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Golden Valley v. One 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix, Vin 1g2wp521wf309530, Pennsylvania License Plate P520111 616 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
“Findings of fact are considered clearly erroneous only if they are not reasonably supported by the evidence.” Id.; (holding reversal not warranted unless “reviewing court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made”); (“In general, a trial court’s findings of fact will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.”).
Vangsness v. Vangsness 607 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Vangsness v. Vangsness 607 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom 602 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom 602 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
This court will reverse a district court’s findings of fact only if, upon review of all the evidence, we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (Citations omitted).
Rogers v. Moore 603 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1999
Rogers v. Moore 603 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1999
In Re the Estate of Van Den Boom 590 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re the Estate of Van Den Boom 590 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer Press 589 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1999
Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer Press 589 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1999
Findings of fact are clearly erroneous only'if the reviewing court is “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Pinotti 585 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1998
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Pinotti 585 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1998
Morrison v. Doyle 570 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Morrison v. Doyle 570 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
*699 The district court found in its order of attachment 2 that Doyle “assigned, secreted and disposed of non-exempt property with intent to delay and defraud his creditors, the [Morrisons].” This court will reverse a district court’s findings of fact only if, upon review of the entire evidence, it is “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
New Horizon Enterprises, Inc. v. Contemporary Closet Design, Inc. 570 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
New Horizon Enterprises, Inc. v. Contemporary Closet Design, Inc. 570 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Robinson v. State 567 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
Robinson v. State 567 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
That means that this court will not reverse, unless “upon review of the entire evidence, [the] court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
Carlson Real Estate Co. v. Soltan 549 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Carlson Real Estate Co. v. Soltan 549 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
This court will reverse a trial court’s findings of fact if, “upon review of the entire evidence, we are ‘left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.’ ” (), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Gergen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 548 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Gergen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 548 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
A finding of fact is clearly erroneous “ ‘only if, upon review of the entire evidence, a reviewing court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.’ ” Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., ().
Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp. 531 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp. 531 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Finally, this court will only reverse a trial court’s findings of fact if, upon review of the entire evidence, we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (), pet.
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 14 v. City of St. Paul 533 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 14 v. City of St. Paul 533 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
[T]his court will only reverse a trial court’s findings of fact if, upon review of the entire evidence, we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made” (), pet.
Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 525 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Novack v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 525 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
A district court’s “finding of fact will be reversed only if, upon review of the entire evidence, a reviewing court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
Benson v. Empire State Bank 516 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Benson v. Empire State Bank 516 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
A district court’s “findings of fact will be reversed only if, upon review of the entire evidence, a reviewing court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
In Re Guardianship of Dawson 502 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re Guardianship of Dawson 502 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Lakeview Terrace Homeowners Ass'n v. Le Rivage, Inc. 498 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Lakeview Terrace Homeowners Ass'n v. Le Rivage, Inc. 498 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Snesrud v. Instant Web, Inc. 484 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Snesrud v. Instant Web, Inc. 484 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1992

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by