Cited by

To deem a factual finding clearly erroneous, the reviewing court must be “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”

A referee’s findings and conclusions are clearly erroneous when they leave us “ ‘with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.’ ” ().

Findings of fact are clearly erroneous if they are not reasonably supported b y the evidence and the reviewing court is “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”

" In re Lyons , , 635 (Minn. 2010) (quoting Gjovik v. Strope , , 667 (Minn. 1987) ).

A finding is clearly errone ous only if the reviewing court is “left with 9 the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” Gjovik v. Strope

Factual findings are clearly erroneous if, after reviewing the record, we are “ ‘left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.’” ().

Paul Pioneer Press, (“An appellate court may not reverse a trial court due to mere disagreement with its findings.”); (appellate court “should not substitute its findings for that of the trial court merely because it feels that the case was wrongly decided”).

A district court’s factual findings will be reversed only if, after reviewing the entire record, we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”

We have also stated that a factual finding is clearly erroneous only if we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” Fletcher, d at 101 ().

’s counsel stated, “I don’t know whether or not” the documents he wanted to offer confidentially “are sufficient to actually establish mitigation per se.” 10 findings are clearly erroneous when we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” ().

A referee’s findings are clearly erroneous when we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” ().

Findings of fact are clearly erroneous only if the reviewing court is “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”

A finding is clearly erroneous if we are “ ‘left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.’ ” ().

We review a district court’s factual findings for clear error, reversing “only if, upon review of the entire evidence, [we are] left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” see also Minn. R. Civ.

A referee’s findings are “clearly erroneous” when we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” ().

To conclude that a referee’s findings are “clearly erroneous,” we must be “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”

The clearly erroneous standard requires that we be “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”

A district court’s factual findings will be reversed only if, after reviewing the entire record, we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has *11 been made.”

see also United States v. True, 250 F.3d 410, 422 (6th Cir.2001) (defining abuse-of-discretion standard for reviewing attorney fees awarded under EAJA).

Therefore, we will reverse the district court’s findings of fact only if, upon review of all the evidence, we are “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”

To find that a referee’s findings were “clearly erroneous,” this court must be “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” ().