Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eggersgluss v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 393 N.W.2d 183.

51 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Safety, (explaining that, when a “[d]efendant obviously was not being truthful in his response [to a police officer’s question], .
Charles Wayne Weyhrauch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Safety, Delong v. Comm’r of Pub.
State of Minnesota v. David Francis Chamberlain Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. David Francis Chamberlain Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, (noting that lack of truthfulness may show consciousness of guilt).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Safety, d 183, 185 (Minn. 1986) (noting that lack of truthfulness may show consciousness of guilt).
Eric Michael Deroos, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Safety , (reversi ng this court’s decision and sustaining revocation).
Craig Philip Christianson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Safety , (affirming revocation where passenger admitted the driver had been dri nking before the accident despite a 2.5-hour delay between the acc ident and the officer’s observations); Weldon v. Comm’r of Pub.
State of Minnesota v. Marlon James Sands Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Marlon James Sands Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Peter Alan Krech v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Peter Alan Krech v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Safety, -85 (Minn. 1986) (concluding that an officer had probable cause to believe the defendant had been driving while impaired at the time of a one-car accident at 4:30 a.m.
State of Minnesota v. Darren Ray Liimatainen Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Darren Ray Liimatainen Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Safety, (stating that a suspect’s “lack of truthfulness” in response to an officer’s questions showed consciousness of guilt).
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Douglas Ankney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Douglas Ankney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Safety, (“Defendant obviously was not being truthful in his response, and his lack of truthfulness showed a consciousness of guilt.”).
Rufus Cornelius Loyd v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rufus Cornelius Loyd v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Daniel Michael Lieser v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Daniel Michael Lieser v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Groe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 615 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Groe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 615 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Shane v. Commissioner of Public Safety 587 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1998
Shane v. Commissioner of Public Safety 587 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1998
State v. Lee 577 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Lee 577 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Safety, (holding probable cause existed where driver was involved in one-car rollover accident at 4:30 a.m., driver’s breath smelled of alcohol, and passenger reported driver had been drinking).
Heuton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 541 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Heuton v. Commissioner of Public Safety 541 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Safety, (examining totality of circumstances, including passenger reported drinking and one-car rollover at 4:30 a.m., to conclude probable cause existed); Stiles v. Commissioner of Pub.
State v. Shepard 481 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1992
State v. Shepard 481 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1992
(the fact that the accident was a one-car rollover was deemed relevant to whether the driver was under the influence; “turn in the road apparently was a simple turn that defendant *563 should have been able to negotiate” and the "fact that he did not bears on the determination of whether he was under
Steele v. Commissioner of Public Safety 439 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Steele v. Commissioner of Public Safety 439 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Franko v. Commissioner of Public Safety 432 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Franko v. Commissioner of Public Safety 432 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Storvick 428 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1988
State v. Storvick 428 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1988
Relevant cases include: (circumstances of accident used to establish that police had probable cause that defendant was under influence at time of accident; also, defendant’s lack of truthfulness in *61 talking with the police showed consciousness of guilt on his part, which in turn bore on probable cause issue); State v. Spe
Nesseth v. Commissioner of Public Safety 416 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nesseth v. Commissioner of Public Safety 416 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Andersen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hedstrom v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Andersen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hedstrom v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dutcher v. Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dutcher v. Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Overline v. State, Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Overline v. State, Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Vangstad v. Commissioner of Public Safety 404 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Vangstad v. Commissioner of Public Safety 404 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Weldon v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rohlik v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Weldon v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 1987