Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite AMCO Insurance Co. v. Lang, 420 N.W.2d 895.

33 citing documents.

Pamela Sue Platz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Northrup v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 601 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Northrup v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 601 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Cantu v. Atlanta Casualty Companies 532 N.W.2d 261 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Cantu v. Atlanta Casualty Companies 535 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1995
Cantu v. Atlanta Casualty Companies 532 N.W.2d 261 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Lang, Murphy v. Milbank Mut.
Cantu v. Atlanta Casualty Companies 535 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1995
and Hauer v. Integrity Mut.
Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin 513 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 1994
Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin 513 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 1994
In support of this proposition, we observed that “it has been the rule in Mnnesota that first party coverages follow the person, not the vehicle.” If the law of North Dakota promised Jep-son a greater recovery than Minnesota, we doubt very much that he would be litigating this coverage dispute in our courts.
Lessard v. Milwaukee Insurance Co. 496 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Lessard v. Milwaukee Insurance Co. 496 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Sutherland v. Allstate Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Sutherland v. Allstate Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Rydberg v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 453 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Rydberg v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 453 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Paulson v. Lapa, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Paulson v. Lapa, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Roering v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. 444 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1989
Roering v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. 444 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1989
Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Zurich Insurance Co. 439 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Zurich Insurance Co. 439 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(subsequent change in public policy does not validate insurance contract provisions which violated public policy and, therefore, were invalid when the insurance policy was issued).
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Luhman 438 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Luhman 438 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
However, the 1985 amendment, which applied only to policies renewed after September 30, 1985, is inapplicable in this case.
Wille v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 432 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Wille v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 432 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Wondra v. American Family Insurance Group 432 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Wondra v. American Family Insurance Group 432 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
*459 898 (Mimi.1988) (an insurance policy is customarily governed by the law in effect at the time the policy is issued or the contract made)
Amer. Fam. Ins. v. Metro. Transit Com'n 424 N.W.2d 825 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
American Family Insurance v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 424 N.W.2d 825 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Amer. Fam. Ins. v. Metro. Transit Com'n 424 N.W.2d 825 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
American Family Insurance v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 424 N.W.2d 825 Minn. Ct. App. 1988