Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hapka v. Paquin Farms, 458 N.W.2d 683.

75 citing documents.

Cambria Company, LLC v. M&M Creative Laminants, Inc. dba M&M Creative Laminates, Inc., ... Minn. 2024
Cambria Company, LLC v. M&M Creative Laminants, Inc. dba M&M Creative Laminates, Inc., ... Minn. 2024
does not transform a contract of sale into a contract for services.’ ” (Quoting Valley Farmers’ d 683 (Minn. 1990)).
Minn. 2022
Compare Valley Farmers’ (“We adopt the ‘predominant factor’ test”), and McCarthy Well Co. v. St.
Aegis Insurance Services, LTD., and other interested insurers as subrogees of Northern States Power Co. and Southern Minnesota … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. 911 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2018
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. 911 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2018
Architects, Inc. , , 821 (Minn. 1984), overruled on other grounds by Hapka v. Paquin Farms , , 686-87 (Minn. 1990).
Northern States Power Company, Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, Aegis Insurance Services, LTD., and other interested insurers as … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[T]he Uniform Commercial Code must control exclusively with respect to damages in a commercial transaction which involves property damage only.” Hapka v. Paquin Farms
County of Hennepin v. 1010 Metrodome Square, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
County of Hennepin v. 1010 Metrodome Square, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Valley Farmers’ –56 (Minn. 1987)
Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company 848 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2014
Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company 848 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2014
(Yetka, J., dissenting) (quoting W. Prosser, Handbook of the Law of Torts § 92, at 613 (4th ed. 1971)).
Tatro v. University of Minnesota 816 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2012
Tatro v. University of Minnesota 816 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2012
Miller v. Lankow 801 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 2011
Miller v. Lankow 801 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 2011
Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990).
Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp. 796 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp. 796 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
Bradley v. First Nat. Bank of Walker, N.A. 711 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Bradley v. First Nat. Bank of Walker, N.A. 711 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(holding that Article 2 of the UCC preempts common law claims); Hedged Inv.
In Re GlaxoSmithKline Plc 699 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 2005
In Re GlaxoSmithKline Plc 699 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 2005
-40 (Minn.1996); accord Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990).
Gray v. Badger Mining Corp. 676 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 2004
Gray v. Badger Mining Corp. 676 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 2004
In Minneapolis Soc’y -22 (Minn. 1984), we held that the manufacturer of bricks had no duty to instruct on the appropriate precautions to follow when installing them because “the evidence was overwhelming that the architects employed by [the plaintiff] should have known” of the necessary precautions.
State v. Baird 654 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 2002
State v. Baird 654 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 2002
2881 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1047 (1991); and Wolner v. Mahaska Indus., Inc., -43 (Minn.1982) (applying the special circumstances test and holding that Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp., et al., which limited tort recovery for economic losses in commercial transactions, did not apply retroactively).
Halla v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. 601 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Halla v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. 601 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(legislature did not intend for tort law to circumvent U.C.C.’s statutory scheme)
Hedged Investment Partners, L.P. v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. 578 N.W.2d 765 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Hedged Investment Partners, L.P. v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. 578 N.W.2d 765 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co. 572 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co. 572 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Farms, (concluding code remedies may be less than adequate in ordinary consumer transaction).
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
P. 117; -40 (Minn.1996); Northwest Racquet Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. v. De-loitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990); Hon.
Anderly v. City of Minneapolis 552 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1996
Anderly v. City of Minneapolis 552 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1996
See Northwest Racquet Swim and Health Clubs, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, , 613 n. 1 (Minn.1995); -86 (Minn.1990).
Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of Minnesota 518 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1994
Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of Minnesota 518 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1994
Valley Farmers’ McCarthy Well Co. v. St.
Buller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1994
Buller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1994
Finally, Judge Marshall held that count II of the 1983 complaint and counts I and IV of the 1984 complaints (negligence and products liability claims) were barred by this court’s (modified in a ).
City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 512 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1994
City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 512 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1994
See, e.g., Lloyd F. Smith Co. v. Den-Tal-Ez, Inc.
Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of Minnesota 506 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of Minnesota 506 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 505 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1993
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 505 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1993
any claim that the judgment creditors have is a warranty claim.
City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 498 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 498 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(emphasis supplied) Perhaps the principal case construing the scope of section 336.2-725
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 500 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1993