Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hapka v. Paquin Farms, 458 N.W.2d 683.

75 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 500 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1993
that petitioners must identify the issues they wish us to hear, we decline to hear those issues not raised in the petition.
Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 495 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 495 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
the supreme court clarified its holding in Superwood and held: [T]he Uniform Commercial Code must control exclusively with respect to damages in a commercial transaction which involves property damage' only, and any statement or implication to the contrary in Superwood and its progeny is hereby expre
Drager Ex Rel. Gutzman v. Aluminum Industries Corp. 495 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Drager Ex Rel. Gutzman v. Aluminum Industries Corp. 495 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Architects, Inc., (explaining “there is no duty to warn if the user knows or should know the potential danger”)
Lloyd F. Smith Co. v. Den-Tal-Ez, Inc. 491 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1992
Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc. 491 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1992
Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc. 491 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1992
In the past, we have carefully distinguished between experienced commercial parties and ordinary consumer transactions when interpreting the U.C.C.: “[W]e continue to regard the Code remedies as something less than adequate in the ordinary consumer transaction.”
Lloyd F. Smith Co. v. Den-Tal-Ez, Inc. 491 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1992
Subsequently, however, we ruled: [I]n our judgment the Uniform Commercial Code must control exclusively with respect to damages in a commercial transaction which involves property damage only, and any statement or implication to the contrary in Superwood and its progeny is hereby expressly overruled.
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 483 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 483 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Lloyd F. Smith Co., Inc. v. Den-Tal-Ez 478 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Lloyd F. Smith Co., Inc. v. Den-Tal-Ez 478 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
ZumBerge v. Northern States Power Co. 481 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
ZumBerge v. Northern States Power Co. 481 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
After the jury verdict for the ZumBerges, NSP moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial arguing (1) its rate tariff precluded recovery of consequential damages; (2) prevents the ZumBerges’ recovery for economic losses; (3) the trial court *106 erred in its evidentiary rulings; and (4) the trial court erroneously submitted to the jury a calculation which represented pre-verdict interest.
Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
It urges this court, however, (commercial transactions for sale of goods which involve economic loss only are not recoverable in tort).
Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Crookston v. Agassiz Construction, Inc. 476 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Crookston v. Agassiz Construction, Inc. 476 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
( which allowed tort recovery of economic losses for “personal injury or damage to other property” arising out of commercial transactions).
City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1991
City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1991
overruled on other grounds
Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1991
Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1991
See, ( in regard to UCC pre-emption of the law of negligence in cases involving damage to other property); (declining to follow Patton v. Thompson Elec.
TCF Bank & Sav. v. Marshall Truss Sys. 466 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
TCF Bank & Sav. v. Marshall Truss Sys. 466 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Valley Farmers’ overruled on other grounds