Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of L.A.F., 554 N.W.2d 393.

204 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: I. M. W. and R. J. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(noting that termination decisions are given considerable deference because the district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. S. and T. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We grant the district court’s decision considerable deference because the “court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. S. and T. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. J. M. and A. D. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. J. M. and A. D. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision [to terminate 15 parental rights] because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. J. H., B. R. J. and R. … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. J. H., B. R. J. and R. … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. D. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. D. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We give “[c]onsiderable deference” to the district court’s decision to terminate parental rights because the district court “is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. F., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. F., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. S. H. and X. L. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. S. H. and X. L. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(noting that “a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses” (); (stating that “[appellate courts] defer to the district court
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. and M. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. and M. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision [to terminate parental rights] because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. A. W. and C. K., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. A. W. and C. K., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Welfare of J.H. 829 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(deferring to the district court’s credibility determinations).
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.L.L. 801 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.L.L. 801 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In Re the Welfare of the Child of D.L.D. 771 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Welfare of the Child of D.L.D. 771 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Welfare of the Child of S.S.W. 767 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Welfare of the Child of S.S.W. 767 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.C.M. 758 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.C.M. 758 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
On review, “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.D. 731 N.W.2d 548 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.D. 731 N.W.2d 548 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.W. 727 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.W. 727 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In re the Child of A.S. 698 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re As 698 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re As 698 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In re the Child of A.S. 698 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.W. 678 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2004
In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.W. 678 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2004
In Re the Children of Wildey 669 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Children of Wildey 669 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
On appeal in this termination-of-parental-rights proceeding, appellant-father, who is incarcerated, argues (a) the county failed to make reasonable efforts to reunite the family and the district court’s reliance on to rule that such efforts were not required, misreads the case; (b) the record does not support the determination that father abandoned his children where the county failed to give father the information necessary to contact his children; (c) the record does not support the determinat
In Re the Child of Simon 662 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Child of Simon 662 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
1 (2002); -97 (Minn. 1996); see also Minn.Stat.
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003