Cited by

(deferring to the district court’s credibility determinations).

But in this case, as the district court found, DCSS “filed a 4 court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

On appeal, “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

(“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).

d 393, 396 (Minn. 1996) (“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).

that the best-interests analysis “consists of weighing three primary factors: [1] the child’s interest in maintaining the parent-child relationship, [2] the parents’ interest in maintaining the parent- child relationship, and [3] any competing interest of the child.” (numerals added); - 79 (Minn. 1990); rev. denied (Minn. Jan.

The district court found this testimony credible, a finding appellate courts give “considerable deference.”

see also J.K.T., d at 97 (concluding any prejudice stemming from erroneously admitted evidence was minimal in a bench trial regarding termination of parental rights).

d 393, 396 (Minn. 1996).

We defer to the district court’s credibility determination because the district court “is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

Further, “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

On appeal, “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

The appellate court defers to the district court’s decision “because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

Appellate courts give “[c]onsiderable deference” to 10 the district court’s decision given its “superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

(“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).

(“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s 28 decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).

And appellate courts give “[c]onsiderable deference” to 4 the district court’ s decision given its “superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

(), rev. denied (Minn. July 17, 2007).

01; (“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).

“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

(“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).

Appellate courts give “[c]onsiderable deference” to the district court’s decision given its “superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

We give considerable deference to the district court’s decision “because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

In part, this deference is based on the district court’s “superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

396 (Minn. 1996) (“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).

In TPR cases, “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior pos ition to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

from a district c ourt’s termination of parental rights, appellate courts “closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether it was clear and convincing,” S.E.P., d at 385, and “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

from a district court’s order terminating parental rights, appellate courts “closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether it was clear and convincing,” S.E.P., d at 385, and “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”

from a district court’s termination of parental rights, appellate courts “closely inquire into the suffi ciency of the evidence to de termine whether it was clear and convincing,” S.E.P., d at 385, and “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.” (Mi nn.