Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bliss v. Stevens, 551 N.W.2d 919.

103 citing documents.

State v. Martinson 581 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1998
Similarly, this court has held that “[a] brief investigatory stop requires only reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, rather than probable cause.” , 921 (Minn.1996) (citing Terry, 392 U.S. at 21-22 , 88 S.Ct.
State v. Holmes 569 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1997
1769, 1776-77 , 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996) (stating that routine traffic stops are constitutional where police have probable cause to believe that a traffic violation has occurred); -22 (Minn.1996) (same); Berge, d at 733 (same).
State v. Fiebke 554 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(officer must be unaware of facts dispelling suspicion that revoked owner is driving); State v. McKinley, 305 Minn. 297, 304 , (stop may not be based on “mere whim, caprice, or idle curiosity”).