Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ingram, 570 N.W.2d 173.

28 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Michael Patrick Daly Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Norton Engel Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Norton Engel Minn. Ct. App. 2025
ng “the contention that evidence of a defendant’s resistance to an illegal arrest must be 10 suppressed as forbidden fruit of a Fourth Amendment violation by the police”); (“Minnesota law does not recognize [a] defendant’s asserted right to resist an unlawful arrest or search.”); -79 (Minn. App. 1997) (noting that “evidence of a crime committed in response to an illegal police arrest or search is not suppressed as the fruit of the prior illegality,” and concluding that “[d]espite the illegality
State of Minnesota v. Drew Douglas Wiskow Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Drew Douglas Wiskow Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Presence of Intervening Circumstances Resisting arrest and flight from an officer, even if prompted by an illegal arrest, may be “intervening circumstances sufficient to purge the illegality of its primary taint.” rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. T. B. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
”); State v. Ingram , -78 (Minn. App. 1997) (concluding that an attempted pat -frisk was not justified because there was no indication that the defendant was involved in “ a type of crime for which the offender would normally be armed” ), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Dec.
Troy Kenneth Scheffler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Moreover, even if Scheffler’s arrest was unlawful he had no right to resist because “Minnesota law does not recognize [a] defendant’s asserted right to resist an unlawful arrest or search.” (stating that “[a] defendant may not resort to self-help to resolve disputes concerning unreasonable .
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Michael Galler Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Michael Galler Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Id.; (concluding that where the subject pushed an officer away and fled in the midst of an unlawful seizure, his physical resistance and flight constituted a sufficient intervening circumstance to purge the illegality of the initial seizure), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Marie Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Marie Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
( review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Carlester Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Charles Carlester Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The district court concluded that the evidence found on appellant’s person was admissible because appellant’s “flight from Officer Brost was an intervening circumstance sufficient to purge the taint of the illegal search.” review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Leroy Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Leroy Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Richard Joseph Wollenberg Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Richard Joseph Wollenberg Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Larry Dusaun Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Dusaun Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that drug dealing is not a type of crime that automatically gives police the right to frisk for weapons), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Morin 736 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Morin 736 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(holding that flight from police is an intervening circumstance that purges any illegal police conduct of its taint for Fourth Amendment purposes), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Miller 659 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Bergerson 659 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Bergerson 659 N.W.2d 791 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
B. The presence of intervening circumstances This factor requires us to determine whether the state has shown that Berger-son’s actions were “intervening circumstances sufficient to purge the illegality of its primary taint.” review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Miller 659 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In addition, “merely speaking with and being in close proximity with others suspected of criminal activity, without more, may be insufficient ⅜ * * to reach the threshold of reasonable articulable suspicion.” review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Olson 634 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Olson 634 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review denied (Minn. Dec.