Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Law, 620 N.W.2d 562.

24 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Dequarn Markeyth Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We recognize “the broad discretion of the trial court in sentencing matters” and are generally “loath to interfere.” rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Eugene Bilges Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-65 (Minn. App. 2000), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Anthony Cruz Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-65 (Minn. App. 2000), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Scott Allen Lipe Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Law , -65 (Minn. App. 2000), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Karl Edward Henze Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-65 (Minn. App. 2000), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2018
This court can “modify a departure if it has a ‘strong feeling’ the sentence is inappropriate.” State v. Law , review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Severo Perez-Nava Minn. Ct. App. 2018
31, 2009); (reversing a stayed sentence for attempted murder that included both an upward durational departure and a downward dispositional departure, based on this court’s collective experience that “the severity of [the defendant’s] violent act dictate[d] a different result”), review denied (Minn. Dec
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Scott Sundblad Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(stating district courts have broad discretion in sentencing decisions), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Adam Wallace Jaunich Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Adam Wallace Jaunich Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Although the district court enjoys broad discretion over sentencing matters, “[t]his court will modify a departure if it has a strong feeling the sentence is inappropriate to the case.” review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Walter David Tischer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Walter David Tischer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Dionte Gosa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dionte Gosa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-65 (Minn. App. 2000), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota (A15-1247) (A15-1255) v. Randall Samuel Stempfley (A15-1247) (A15-1255) Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota (A15-1247) (A15-1255) v. Randall Samuel Stempfley (A15-1247) (A15-1255) Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“In balancing the mitigating and aggravating factors of a given case, a departure must be reversed if it understates the degree of the defendant’s culpability.” review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
But a district court has broad discretion in sentencing criminal defendants, review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Saue 688 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Saue 688 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See, (stating that, in this court’s “strongly *345 held judgment,” a downward dispositional departure for attempted second-degree murder “constitute[d] an abuse of the lawful parameters of trial-court discretion”), review denied (Minn. Dec.
State v. Hickman 666 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Hickman 666 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. Dee.
State v. Misquadace 629 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Misquadace 629 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review denied (Minn. Dec.