Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lloyd, 345 N.W.2d 240.
-
West v. State
390 N.W.2d 368
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
2248 , 90 L.Ed.2d -(1986)
- State v. Nordstrum 385 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Nordstrum 385 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Dooley 380 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Dooley 380 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Beard 380 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Beard 380 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Anderson 379 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1985
-
State v. Anderson
379 N.W.2d 70
Minn. 1985
this court held that resolving conflicting testimony is the exclusive function of the jury because it has had the opportunity to observe the demeanor of witnesses and to weigh their credibility.
- State v. Lakin 378 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Lakin
378 N.W.2d 101
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The jury resolves testimonial conflicts
- State v. Best 370 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Best 370 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Christianson 361 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1985
- State v. Christianson 361 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1985
- State v. Hughes 355 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Hughes
355 N.W.2d 500
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The trial court was warranted in rejecting Hughes’ theory that he was a passenger because the theory was “too speculative to create a reasonable doubt.”
- State v. Goodridge 352 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1984
- State v. Goodridge 352 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1984