Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cox v. Slama, 355 N.W.2d 401.

30 citing documents.

A23-0893 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The right to counsel is also guaranteed “in cases where lack of counsel could well result in a deprivation of ‘life, liberty, or property without due process of law.’” Cox 9 v. Slama, (quoting U.S. Const., amend.
In re the Matter of: Emily M. Pederson v. Scott H. Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: Emily M. Pederson v. Scott H. Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-04 (Minn. 1984) (holding, in civil contempt proceeding, that counsel must be provided to an indigent party facing the real possibility of incarceration for contempt).
Thole v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Thole v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
have the assistance of counsel in his defense.’ ” (quoting U.S. Const. amend.
In Re the Welfare of J.B. 782 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2010
In Re the Welfare of J.B. 782 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2010
§ 524.5-304(b) (2008) (guardianship matters); -04 (Minn.1984) (civil contempt proceedings); State v. Borst, 278 Minn. 388, 397 , (invoking inherent power of court to provide counsel in misdemeanor cases).
In Re Conservatorship of Malecha 607 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re Conservatorship of Malecha 607 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(civil-contempt proceedings for failure to pay child support); (paternity action).
State v. Tatum 556 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1996
State v. Tatum 556 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1996
see also Hopp v. Hopp, 279 Minn. 170, 174-75 , -17 (1968).
State v. Nodes 538 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Nodes 538 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Lefthand 488 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 1992
State v. Lefthand 488 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 1992
Marriage of Warwick v. Warwick 438 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Warwick v. Warwick 438 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
§ 518.24 (1988) (“[if] the obligor disobeys the [maintenance or support] order it is prima facie evidence of contempt”); (“Minnesota courts have statutory authority to enforce maintenance and child support obligations by imposing sanctions in civil contempt proceedings”); -404 (Minn.1984) (parents held in contempt for failure to pay child support are entitled to counsel when incarceration is a “real possibility”).
Walz v. Walz 409 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Walz v. Walz 409 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Since Hopp was decided, the court has amplified procedural protection in constructive civil contempt proceedings by holding that a nonperforming party has a right to legal counsel at a point in the proceeding that “incarceration is a real possibility.”
Marriage of Prebil v. Juergens 378 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Prebil v. Juergens 378 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Henry v. Henry 370 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Henry v. Henry 370 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The Minnesota Supreme Court held that an indigent parent is entitled to counsel in a contempt hearing for nonsupport at that point where incarceration is a “real possibility.”
Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public Safety 369 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1985
Marriage of Ronay v. Ronay 369 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Ronay v. Ronay 369 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public Safety 365 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public Safety 365 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Likewise, the court established the right to counsel for persons facing civil contempt for failure to pay child support when incarceration is a real possibility.
Barth v. Barth 356 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Barth v. Barth 356 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
At oral argument, then pending before the Minnesota Supreme Court.