Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Peake, 366 N.W.2d 299.

111 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Robert John Meyers 869 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Darnell Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Darnell Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
if aggravating or mitigating circumstances are present; if aggravating or mitigating circumstances are not present, the trial court has no discretion to depart.” (emphasis omitted)
State of Minnesota v. Jared Armand Cobb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jared Armand Cobb Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Basil Benna Dudley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Basil Benna Dudley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota v. Gary Richard Wessman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gary Richard Wessman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Substantial and compelling” circumstances exist when the circumstances “make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota v. Robert John Meyers 853 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Robert John Meyers 853 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Roger Darnell Webb Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Roger Darnell Webb Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State v. Johnson 831 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Johnson 831 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Substantial and compelling circumstances are those which “make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State v. Robideau 783 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Robideau 783 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Olson 765 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Olson 765 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State v. Petschl 688 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Petschl 688 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Taylor v. State 670 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2003
Taylor v. State 670 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2003
State v. DeShay 645 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. DeShay 645 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Esler 553 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Esler 553 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Behl 547 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Behl 547 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Chaklos 522 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Chaklos 522 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Williams, d at 782 (quoting State v. Peake, *364 ).
State v. Bock 490 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Bock 490 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State v. Brovold 477 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Brovold 477 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Dalsen 444 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Dalsen 444 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines 1.4, II.D
State v. Wenthold 427 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Wenthold 427 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Williams 414 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Williams 414 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State v. Butenhoff 392 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Butenhoff 392 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
1985); and two offenses involving personal injury
State v. Robinson 388 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Robinson 388 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Stauffacher 380 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1986