Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Peake, 366 N.W.2d 299.

111 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“ Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.” ().
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota v. Lee Daniel Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Lee Daniel Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
Karl Alfredo Rosillo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Karl Alfredo Rosillo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.” ().
State of Minnesota v. Isaac Gutierrez Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Isaac Gutierrez Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.” State v. Olson, 765 ().
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.” State v. Peake
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particul ar case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.” State v. Peake
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different 4 from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different f rom a typical case.” State v. Peake
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.” State v. Peake
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those 4 circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
A18-1219 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical c ase.” State v. Peake
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the f acts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Substantial and comp elling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.” State v. Peake , d 299, 301 (Minn. 1985).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those 4 circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State v. Stempfley 900 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2017
A15-1255 Minn. 2017
We have defined “ [s]ubstantial and compelling circ umstances” as “those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.” State v. Peake , (emphasis added) (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Lawrence Lee Hicks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lawrence Lee Hicks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
21, 1986), is misguided because, in both cases, victim injury was an element of the prior felony conviction.
State of Minnesota v. Ammanuel Ray Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ammanuel Ray Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Substantial and compelling circumstances are those which “make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota, (A15-1247), (A15-1255) v. Randall Samuel Stempfley, (A15-1247), (A15-1255). A15-1247 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota, (A15-1247), (A15-1255) v. Randall Samuel Stempfley, (A15-1247), (A15-1255). A15-1247 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.”
State of Minnesota v. Robert John Meyers 869 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2015