Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Hein v. Hein, 366 N.W.2d 646.

32 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Perrill, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
While a district court generally enjoys broad discretion regarding the division of property in marriage dissolutions, that discretion is narrower in the nonmarital-property-division context.
In re the Marriage of: Tracy Wong Belcher, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
While a district court generally enjoys broad discretion regarding the division of property in marriage dissolutions, Hein v. Hein , that discretion is narrower in the nonmarital-property-division context.
In re the Marriage of: Rachel Lynn Rogers v. David Matthew Rogers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Rachel Lynn Rogers v. David Matthew Rogers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
While a district court generally enjoys broad discretion regarding the division of property in marriage dissolutions, that discretion is narrower in the nonmarital-property-division context.
Stageberg v. Stageberg 695 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Stageberg v. Stageberg 695 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
in support of his ar *619 gument that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding unfair hardship.
Crosby v. Crosby 587 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Crosby v. Crosby 587 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Reynolds v. Reynolds 498 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Reynolds v. Reynolds 498 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner 427 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner 427 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
20, 1986) (citing Ronnkvist, d at 766 )
Marriage of Pavlasek v. Pavlasek 415 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Pavlasek v. Pavlasek 415 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
the trial court awarded the wife $300 a month spousal maintenance for three years, reasoning she “will be able to accelerate completion of her education and increase her earning capacity”.
Marriage of Hafner v. Hafner 406 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hafner v. Hafner 406 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wilkus-Schmidt-Hight v. Wilkus 398 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wilkus-Schmidt-Hight v. Wilkus 398 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hreha v. Hreha 392 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hreha v. Hreha 392 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 392 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 392 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Keithahn v. Keithahn 392 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Keithahn v. Keithahn 392 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The trial court erred by assuming age 65 retirement, (determination of retirement age arbitrary when not supported by the record or findings), and in not adopting the expert’s opinion on value of the pension in the absence of any other *781 credible evidence.
Erdahl v. Erdahl 384 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Erdahl v. Erdahl 384 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
It is well established that a trial court’s discretion “is not unlimited and should be supported by clear documentary or testimonial evidence or by comprehensive findings issued by the court.” ().
Marriage of Ranik v. Ranik 383 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ranik v. Ranik 383 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
*435 where the court traced an inheritance received by the husband to the homestead.
Marriage of Durand v. Durand 367 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Durand v. Durand 367 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
This court recently addressed the issue of valuation of a Minneapolis police officer’s