Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc., 356 N.W.2d 713.

27 citing documents.

, A17-2080, A17-2081, A18-0015 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Giuliani v. Stuart Corp. , Tretter v. Liquipak Int’l, Inc., see McNabb v. Cub Foods , (imputing supervisor’s knowledge of o ther employees’ harassment to employer).
Bradley Yde, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
6 Appellant cites to Tretter v. Liquipak Intern., Inc. , stating that a three-month gap between the employee reporting sexual harassment and her demotion followed by an additional six-month gap between the demotion and her being laid off (for a total of nine months) is sufficient to show causation.
Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Distinguished Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cheryl Kaufenberg v. The Winkley Company d/b/a Winkley Orthotics & Prosthetics Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cheryl Kaufenberg v. The Winkley Company d/b/a Winkley Orthotics & Prosthetics Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Giuliani v. Stuart Corp. 512 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Giuliani v. Stuart Corp. 512 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
41 (1990); Tretter v. Liquipak Int’l, Inc.
Fore v. Health Dimensions, Inc. 509 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Fore v. Health Dimensions, Inc. 509 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cf. Tretter v. Liquipak Int’l, Inc., (employer liable where knew or should have known of supervisor’s acts of harassment but did not discipline supervisor or improve victim’s work environment).
Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
at 383 ; see also Tretter v. Liquipak Int’l, Inc., (imputing supervisor’s knowledge of harassment to employer).
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B. 452 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B. 452 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
App.1987) aff'd in part, rev’d in part, Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc.
Gradine v. College of St. Scholastica 426 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 417 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 417 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
We must defer to the factfinders’ conclusions when the findings “are reasonably supported by evidence in the record considered *292 as a whole.” See Hubbard, d at 441 ; see also Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc., (an appellate court does not “weigh the evidence as if trying the matter de novo,” but determines “if the evidence as a whole sustains the trial court’s findings”).
Mpls. Police Dept. v. Mpls. Civ. Rights Com'n 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mpls. Police Dept. v. Mpls. Civ. Rights Com'n 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc., (Minn.Ct.App.
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc.
Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 399 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 399 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc.
Klink v. Ramsey County Ex Rel. Zacharias 397 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Klink v. Ramsey County Ex Rel. Zacharias 397 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The trial court found, and we agree, that the facts here are distinct from the facts in Continental Can and two subsequent cases, and Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc.
Gruening v. Pinotti 392 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gruening v. Pinotti 392 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Tretter v. Liquipak International, Inc.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by