Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Metropolitan Medical Center, 395 N.W.2d 380.

20 citing documents.

Jordan L. Oslund, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Derrick D. Turner, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Chue Her, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Nancy Peterson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Shawn O’Toole, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“Th e statute does not require actual notice for the appeal period to run.”).
In the Matter of: Tracy Toulouse. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Mackenzie Carney, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(affirming dismissal after DEED sent determination to relator’s last known address).
Douglas Westphal, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Ctr., d 380, 382 (Minn. App. 1986).
Helmut Scholz, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Helmut Scholz, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Godbout v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 827 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Godbout v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 827 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Ctr., (“Where an appeal is untimely, it must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”).
Stassen v. Lone Mountain Truck Leasing, LLC 814 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Stassen v. Lone Mountain Truck Leasing, LLC 814 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Although the time limit for appeal is absolute, if the department fails to mail the notice, the time limit is not triggered.
Kennedy v. American Paper Recycling Corp. 714 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Kennedy v. American Paper Recycling Corp. 714 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Ctr., (concluding that prior unemployment law provided no basis to toll appeal period).
Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 704 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 704 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Management Five, Inc. v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 485 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Management Five, Inc. v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 485 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The 30-day time limit is jurisdictional, and must be strictly construed; “the time for appeal from a Department determination is absolute and there are no provisions for extensions or exceptions.”