DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Metropolitan Medical Center, 395 N.W.2d 380.

20 citing documents.

Jordan L. Oslund v. The Paint Genie, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Derrick D. Turner v. MG McGrath, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Chue Her v. FGT Cabinetry LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Nancy Peterson v. Electrolux Home Products Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Shawn O’Toole v. Wings Financial Credit Union, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“Th e statute does not require actual notice for the appeal period to run.”).
In the Matter of: Tracy Toulouse Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Mackenzie Carney v. Optum Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(affirming dismissal after DEED sent determination to relator’s last known address).
Douglas Westphal v. Friedges Landscaping Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Ctr., d 380, 382 (Minn. App. 1986).
Helmut Scholz v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Helmut Scholz v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Godbout v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 827 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Godbout v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 827 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Ctr., (“Where an appeal is untimely, it must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”).
Stassen v. Lone Mountain Truck Leasing, LLC 814 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Stassen v. Lone Mountain Truck Leasing, LLC 814 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Although the time limit for appeal is absolute, if the department fails to mail the notice, the time limit is not triggered.
Kennedy v. American Paper Recycling Corp. 714 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Kennedy v. American Paper Recycling Corp. 714 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Ctr., (concluding that prior unemployment law provided no basis to toll appeal period).
Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 704 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 704 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Management Five, Inc. v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 485 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Management Five, Inc. v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 485 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The 30-day time limit is jurisdictional, and must be strictly construed; “the time for appeal from a Department determination is absolute and there are no provisions for extensions or exceptions.”