Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Musielewicz v. Musielewicz, 400 N.W.2d 100.

27 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Laura Marie Knutsen v. Peder Nels Knutsen Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Ronald Lee Henrichs, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
This court has stated that spousal maintenance must be determined “ without con sidering the needs of the adult children.” , review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(stating that a spouse’s contributions to adult children “cannot be considered by a court in determining an appropriate level of maintenance”); (“The trial court must fairly determine maintenance without considering the needs of the adult children in setting the amount of maintenance.”), review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Elena Vladimirovna Tokarev v. Vladimir Efimovich Tokarev Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Elena Vladimirovna Tokarev v. Vladimir Efimovich Tokarev Minn. Ct. App. 2017
3 (emphasis added); (noting that wife may be able to become self-supporting in the future, but “[a]s a matter of law,” the district court was “required to make the maintenance award permanent”), review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Roger Alan Roy v. Bonnie LaMay Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Roger Alan Roy v. Bonnie LaMay Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Beth Carolyn Potter v. Joseph Leroy Potter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Beth Carolyn Potter v. Joseph Leroy Potter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This court has held that “[t]he [district] court must fairly determine maintenance without considering the needs of the adult children in setting the amount of maintenance.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis v. Thomas Michael Hallberg Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A “[district] court must fairly determine maintenance without considering the needs of the adult children in setting the amount of maintenance.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Anne Elizabeth Castle-Heaney v. Bruce Edward Heaney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Anne Elizabeth Castle-Heaney v. Bruce Edward Heaney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In any event, we have held that the district court “must fairly determine maintenance without considering the needs of the adult children in setting the amount of maintenance.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
Marriage of McConnell v. McConnell 710 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of McConnell v. McConnell 710 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
24, 1988); review denied (Minn. Mar.
Poehls v. Poehls 502 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Poehls v. Poehls 502 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Katter v. Katter 457 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Katter v. Katter 457 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
LaValle v. LaValle 430 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
LaValle v. LaValle 430 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-04 (Minn.Ct.App.1987), pet.
Marriage of Reif v. Reif 426 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Reif v. Reif 426 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See, e.g., Nardini, d at 198-99 ; pet.
Marriage of Reif v. Reif 410 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Spooner v. Spooner 410 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Reif v. Reif 410 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Spooner v. Spooner 410 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(poor marketability a factor in valuing property).