Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bliss, 457 N.W.2d 385.
- State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Paul Haas Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique Finch
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
4 Lastly, appellant argues that the direct evidence is insufficient because only one of the victim-witnesses appeared for a follow-up interview with the police department and no other witnesses gave statements regarding the shooting.1 Nevertheless, it is “well established that a conviction can rest upon the testimony of a single credible witness,” and the fact that one of the victim- witnesses did not appear for a police interview does not, standing alone, justify overturning appellant’s convict
- State of Minnesota v. Bernard Miles Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Bernard Miles
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“It is well established that a conviction can rest upon the testimony of a single credible witness.”).
- State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Which witnesses to call and what evidence to present to the jury are matters of trial strategy, which are within the discretion of trial counsel.” d 385, 392 (Minn. 1990).
- State of Minnesota v. Abdullahi Jimale Jama Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Abdullahi Jimale Jama
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“It is well established that a conviction can rest upon the testimony of a single credible witness.”
- State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013
- State v. Swinger 800 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- State v. Swinger 800 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- State v. Super 781 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
State v. Super
781 N.W.2d 390
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“Which witnesses to call and what evidence to present to the [factfinder] are matters of trial strategy, which are within the discretion of trial counsel.”
- State v. Johnson 756 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- State v. Johnson 756 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- State v. Jackson 741 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Jackson 741 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Francis v. State 729 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2007
- Francis v. State 729 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2007
- State v. Mems 708 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 2006
- State v. Mems 708 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 2006
- State v. Hadgu 681 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
State v. Hadgu
681 N.W.2d 30
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
“It is well established that a conviction can rest upon the testimony of a single credible witness.” see also State v. Hill, 285 Minn. 518, 518 , (“[A] conviction can rest on the uncorroborated testimony of a single credible witness.”).
- State v. Wright 679 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Wright 679 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Kramer 668 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- State v. Kramer 668 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- State v. Houston 654 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
State v. Houston
654 N.W.2d 727
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Bliss, *737 (stating it is the duty of the jury to determine witness credibility and the weight to be given each witness’s testimony).
- State v. Thao 649 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2002
-
State v. Thao
649 N.W.2d 414
Minn. 2002
Johnson, d at 435 ; Merrill, d at 111 .
- State v. Hearn 647 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Hearn 647 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Henderson 620 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 2001
- State v. Henderson 620 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 2001
- State v. Hunt 615 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2000
- State v. Hunt 615 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2000
- State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Woodruff v. State 608 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 2000
- Woodruff v. State 608 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 2000
- Gassler v. State 590 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1999
- Gassler v. State 590 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1999
- State v. Miles 585 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1998
- State v. Miles 585 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1998
- State v. Shoen 578 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1998
- State v. Shoen 578 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1998
- State v. Occhino 572 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
State v. Occhino
572 N.W.2d 316
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(convictions may rest upon testimony of single credible witness).
- State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997