Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bliss, 457 N.W.2d 385.

119 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
(citing Rainer, d at 495 ).
Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(recognizing choice of witnesses lies in counsel’s discretion); (noting choice of trial tactics generally will not serve as basis for finding ineffective assistance).
State v. Aviles-Alvarez 561 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Aviles-Alvarez 561 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Ostrem 535 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1995
State v. Ostrem 535 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1995
State v. Fields 529 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Fields 529 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Crisler v. State 520 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Crisler v. State 520 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(to be grounds for a new trial, newly-discovered evidence must have capacity to produce a more favorable result).
State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
Dunn v. State 499 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1993
Dunn v. State 499 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1993
Brown v. State 481 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1992
Brown v. State 481 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 1992
Gustafson v. State 477 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1991
Gustafson v. State 477 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1991
“The scope of our review in a post-conviction proceeding is limited to the question of whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the findings of the postconviction court.” ().