Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Drieman, 457 N.W.2d 703.

44 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Drieman , -09 (Minn. 1990).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-09 (Minn. 1990); d 204, 206 (Minn. 1985).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Michael McKinley 891 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Michael McKinley 891 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The [district] court is in the best position to determine 5 whether jurors can be impartial because it hears the prospective jurors’ testimony and observes their demeanor.” −09 (Minn. 1990).
State of Minnesota v. Heather Leann Horst 880 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Heather Leann Horst 880 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Larry Leo Geleneau, Jr. 873 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Leo Geleneau, Jr. 873 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Logan, d at 323; -09 (Minn. 1990).
State of Minnesota v. Calvin James Jennings Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Calvin James Jennings Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Munt 831 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2013
State v. Munt 831 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 2013
State v. Matthews 779 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2010
State v. Matthews 779 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2010
(declining to consider defendant’s new objection to the indictment because it was not included in his original motion objecting to the indictment).
State v. Dorsey 701 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 2005
State v. Courtney 682 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Courtney 682 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Asfeld 662 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 2003
State v. Asfeld 662 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 2003
“[T]his court will uphold admissibility notwithstanding a lack of proximity in time or place if the relevance of the evidence is otherwise clear.”
State v. Burns 632 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Burns 632 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
P. 10.03; (declining to consider defendant’s objections to indictment based on prosecutor’s conduct during grand jury proceedings because defendant did not raise objections in original motion challenging indictment and did not show cause for granting relief from waiver).
State v. Anderson 603 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Anderson 603 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In determining whether to dismiss a potential juror for cause, the trial court must decide whether the juror “can set aside his or her impression or opinion and render an impartial verdict.”
State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
State v. Warren 592 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
70S (Minn.1990) (stating that the trial court has wide discretion in ruling on a change of venue motion and will not be overruled unless a clear abuse of that discretion is shown).
State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
State v. Steinbuch 514 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1994
“Convictions based on circumstantial evidence will be sustained only when the reasonable inferences from such evidence are consistent with defendant’s guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.”
State v. Orfi 511 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Orfi 511 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Scharmer 501 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1993
State v. Scharmer 501 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1993
We must ask whether the reasonable inferences legitimately drawn from the circumstantial evidence presented at trial “are consistent with [appellant’s] guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.” ().
State v. Moore 481 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1992
State v. Moore 481 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1992
State v. Elvin 481 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Elvin 481 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(evidence of assault on another vulnerable victim admissible to show absence of accident).
State v. Frisinger 478 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Frisinger 478 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Everett 472 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1991
State v. Everett 472 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1991
State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
-12 (Minn.1990) (injuries to victim’s penis and anus).