Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McGovern v. City of Minneapolis, 475 N.W.2d 71.

57 citing documents.

Jonathan David Fritz, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Marcia Lee Stresemann, d/b/a Affiliated Counseling Center, LLC v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marcia Lee Stresemann, d/b/a Affiliated Counseling Center, LLC v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
1 DECISION I. Count 2 Appellants argue that the district court erred by denying their motion to dismiss with respect to count 2 of the amended complaint, which alleges a claim or claims arising under section 1983
Sletten v. Ramsey County 675 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2004
Sletten v. Ramsey County 675 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2004
Huttner v. State 637 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Huttner v. State 637 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Merchlewitz v. Midwest 4 Wheel Drive Ass'n 587 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Merchlewitz v. Midwest 4 Wheel Drive Ass'n 587 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Burns v. State 570 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Burns v. State 570 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Edina Education Ass'n v. Board of Education 562 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Edina Education Ass'n v. Board of Education 562 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, -33 (Minn.1995) (denial of summary judgment based on lack of jurisdiction is appealable); (denial of summary judgment based on government’s claim of statutory immunity is appealable).
Harvey v. Dots, Inc. 561 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Harvey v. Dots, Inc. 561 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, (noting that, generally, orders denying summary judgment are not appealable but that an *194 exception exists if the motion that was denied “[was] based on governmental immunity from suit ”) (emphasis added); (noting that immunity “from suit ” is important to officials because the costs of subjecting' officials to litigation, which include distraction from governmental duties, inhibition of discretionary action, and deterrence of able people from gove
Zank v. Larson 552 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1996
Zank v. Larson 552 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1996
Schaffer v. Spirit Mountain Recreation Area Authority 541 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Schaffer v. Spirit Mountain Recreation Area Authority 541 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kalia v. St. Cloud State University 539 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kalia v. St. Cloud State University 539 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Janklow v. BD. OF EXAM. FOR NURS. HOME 536 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Janklow v. BD. OF EXAM. FOR NURS. HOME 536 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Janklow v. Minnesota Board of Examiners for Nursing Home Administrators 536 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Janklow v. Minnesota Board of Examiners for Nursing Home Administrators 536 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. Paul 533 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1995
Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. Paul 533 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1995
McNamara v. McLean 531 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
McNamara v. McLean 531 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Carter v. Cole 526 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Carter v. Cole 526 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
While Minnesota recognizes the right of a government official to an interlocutory appeal from denial of summary judgment based on federal qualified immunity, Anderson, d at 364 , and state common law immunities, we find no ease law allowing a governmental official an interlocutory appeal from a motion denying summary judgment where the only issue raised on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence on the factual allegations.
Martin v. Spirit Mountain Recreation Area Authority 527 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Martin v. Spirit Mountain Recreation Area Authority 527 N.W.2d 167 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
The district court’s (order denying governmental motion for summary judgment based on claim of immunity is immediately appealable).
Hegner v. Dietze 524 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hegner v. Dietze 524 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
BD. OF REGENTS OF U OF M v. Reid 522 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
BD. OF REGENTS OF U OF M v. Reid 522 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-73 (Minn.1991) (denial of discretionary or official immunity is immediately appealable).
Waste Recovery Cooperative v. County of Hennepin 517 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1994
Waste Recovery Cooperative v. County of Hennepin 517 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1994
(extending Anderson to governmental discretionary act immunity).
Leonzal v. Grogan 516 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Leonzal v. Grogan 516 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rasivong v. Lakewood Community College 504 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rasivong v. Lakewood Community College 504 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Waste Recovery Cooperative of Minnesota v. County of Hennepin 504 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Waste Recovery Cooperative of Minnesota v. County of Hennepin 504 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
The Anderson rationale has been extended to allow interlocutory appeal of a denial of absolute prosecutorial immunity, and nonfederal claims of governmental discretionary function immunity and official immunity
McDonough v. City of Rosemount 503 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
McDonough v. City of Rosemount 503 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
LeBaron v. Minnesota Board of Public Defense 499 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
LeBaron v. Minnesota Board of Public Defense 499 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Sirek v. State, Department of Natural Resources 496 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1993