Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Black v. Snyder, 471 N.W.2d 715.
-
Friends to Restore St. Mary's, LLC, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Pastor David Bacon, Pastor Timothy Hepner, Ruth Dold, and Sharon Hvam, individually and as representatives of a class … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Pastor David Bacon, Pastor Timothy Hepner, Ruth Dold, and Sharon Hvam, individually and as representatives of a class …
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Excessive entanglement is, ultimately, a question of degree.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
- LaVonne Pfeil, Individually and as Trustee for Heirs of Henry Pfeil v. St. Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of … 877 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 2016
-
LaVonne Pfeil, Individually and as Trustee for Heirs of Henry Pfeil v. St. Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of …
877 N.W.2d 528
Minn. 2016
In the first, rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
- LaVonne Pfeil, Individually and as Trustee for Heirs of Henry Pfeil v. St. Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
LaVonne Pfeil, Individually and as Trustee for Heirs of Henry Pfeil v. St. Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of …
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The Pfeils next argue that we should “modify” Schoenhals because it (1) review denied (Minn. Aug.
- C.B. ex rel. L.B. v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- CB Ex Rel. LB v. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
CB Ex Rel. LB v. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN
726 N.W.2d 127
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Aug.
-
C.B. ex rel. L.B. v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
726 N.W.2d 127
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“Excessive entanglement is, ultimately, a question of degree.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Doe v. Lutheran High School of Greater Minneapolis 702 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Doe v. Lutheran High School of Greater Minneapolis
702 N.W.2d 322
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
revieio denied (Minn. Aug.
- Egan v. Hamline United Methodist Church 679 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
Egan v. Hamline United Methodist Church
679 N.W.2d 350
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Olson v. First Church of Nazarene 661 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Olson v. First Church of Nazarene
661 N.W.2d 254
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(stating that excessive entanglement is ultimately a question of degree), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- J.M. v. Minnesota District Council of the Assemblies of God 658 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
J.M. v. Minnesota District Council of the Assemblies of God
658 N.W.2d 589
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(holding that prohibition against litigating matters at core of church’s religious practice required dismissal of assistant-pastor’s discharge-related claims), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists 657 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists
657 N.W.2d 569
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
720-21 *575 (Minn.App.1991) (dismissing claims relating to pastor’s appointment and discharge as fundamentally connected to issue of church doctrine and governance, but allowing resolution of sexual harassment claim as resolvable by neutral standards), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists 632 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists
632 N.W.2d 783
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(citing Lemon, 403 U.S. at 614-15 , 91 S.Ct.
- Singleton v. Christ the Servant Evangelical Lutheran Church 541 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Singleton v. Christ the Servant Evangelical Lutheran Church
541 N.W.2d 606
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
at 2112 ; review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Basich v. Board of Pensions (ELCA) 540 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Basich v. Board of Pensions (ELCA)
540 N.W.2d 82
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Lundman v. McKown
530 N.W.2d 807
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Paul & Minneapolis, (permitting litigation of child sexual abuse claims against church), pet for rev. denied (Minn. May 24, 1992); (permitting litigation of sexual harassment claim against church), pet.
- Geraci v. Eckankar 526 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Geraci v. Eckankar
526 N.W.2d 391
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(citing Minker v. Baltimore Annual Conference of United Methodist Church, 894 F.2d 1354, 1360-61 (D.C.Cir.1990)), pet.
- Schoenhals v. Mains 504 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Schoenhals v. Mains
504 N.W.2d 233
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-20 (Minn.App.1991), pet.
- Mrozka v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls. 482 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Mrozka v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls.
482 N.W.2d 806
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(citing Employment Div., Dep’t of Human Resources v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 , 110 S.Ct.