Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of M.P., 542 N.W.2d 71.

24 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: G. U. T., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
overruled in part on other grounds by -24 (Minn. 1998)
A19-1057 A19-1062 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-75 (Minn. App. 1996), overruled in part on other grounds by -24 (Minn. 1998).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. M. L. and E. R. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. M. L. and E. R. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
overruled in part on other grounds by –24 (Minn. 1998).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. M. L. and E. R. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. M. L. and E. R. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
overruled in part on other grounds by -24 (Minn. 1998).
In Re the Welfare of the Child of D.L.D. 771 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Welfare of the Child of D.L.D. 771 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-75 (Minn.App.1996), overruled in part on other grounds by -24 (Minn.1998).
In Re the Termination of the Parental Rights of Tanghe 672 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Followed In Re the Termination of the Parental Rights of Tanghe 672 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
overruled in part on other grounds by -24 (Minn.1998).
In Re the Children of Wildey 669 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Children of Wildey 669 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Vangsness v. Vangsness 607 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Vangsness v. Vangsness 607 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(mentioning "golden thread” analysis when reviewing custody disposition of child after termination of parental rights); (mentioning "golden thread” analysis on appeal of termination of parental rights).
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(“[T]he paramount nature of a child’s best interests is a principle that has been part of Minnesota child welfare law for at least 100 years.”) ( (noting that best interests doctrine “has long been recognized as the common thread in.cas
Matter of Welfare of JM 574 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1998
Matter of Welfare of JM 574 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1998
In Re the Welfare of D.J.N. 568 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Welfare of D.J.N. 568 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Welfare of A.J.C. 556 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of A.J.C. 556 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of D.T.J. 554 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of D.T.J. 554 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-75 (Minn.App.1996); see also Mnn.