Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Watkins, 650 N.W.2d 738.

67 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Dane Joseph Riley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We “defer to the fact-finder on determinations of credibility.” d 738, 741 (Minn. App. 2002).
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Cody Morrison Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Cody Morrison Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Damon Lamont Banks Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Damon Lamont Banks Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We “defer to the fact-finder on determinations of credibility.”
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mahle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mahle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
.”), 7 4.A; (“[T]he presumptive disposition for a permissive consecutive sentence is always an executed sentence.”).
State of Minnesota v. Kalen Duane Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kalen Duane Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Accordingly, we defer to the jury’s credibility determinations, and assume that “the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.”
State of Minnesota v. John Onokwuozo Onyemekeihia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Onokwuozo Onyemekeihia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. David Edward Palmer Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. David Edward Palmer Minn. Ct. App. 2014
This court defers to the jury’s credibility determinations, and assumes that “the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.” d 101, 108 (Minn. 1989).
State v. Rannow 703 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Rannow 703 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Holmes 701 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Holmes 701 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 2005