Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Askerooth, 681 N.W.2d 353.

363 citing documents.

Teric Alan Carlson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gerald John Westman v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ronaldo Earl Rounds Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ronaldo Earl Rounds Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Otherwise, the duration of an investigatory stop may be 8 extended only if doing so would be “reasonably related to the investigation of an offense lawfully discovered or suspected during the stop.” Diede, d at 845 (allowing expansion for “the investigation of only those additional offenses for which the officer develops a reasonable, articulable suspicion within the time necessary to resolve the originally-suspected offense”).
Gerald John Westman v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“An initially valid stop may become invalid if it becomes intolerable in its intensity or scope.” (quotation omitted).
Daniel Garcia-Mendoza v. 2003 Chevy Tahoe, Vin 1GNEC13V23R143453, Plate 235JBM 852 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 2014
Daniel Garcia-Mendoza v. 2003 Chevy Tahoe, Vin 1GNEC13V23R143453, Plate 235JBM 852 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kristopher Lee Roybal Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Daniel Roy Gibbs v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Daniel Roy Gibbs v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The officer testified that he asked appellant to exit the vehicle for officer-safety reasons, because it was dark, it was late at night, and the height of the cab “put[] me in a dangerous situation I don’t care to be put in.” “[A] police officer may order a driver out of a lawfully stopped vehicle without an articulated reason.”
State of Minnesota v. Kristopher Lee Roybal Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Thiel 846 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Thiel 846 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 19-20 , 88 S.Ct.
State v. Griffin 846 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Griffin 846 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Although the Minnesota Constitution in some instances affords greater protection than the United States Constitution, -63 (Minn.2004), we refer to these jointly as "Sixth Amendment” challenges for ease of reference.
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
than the United States Constitution,” our courts “ ‘will [not] cavalierly construe our constitution more expansively than the United States Supreme Court has construed the federal constitution.’ ” -62 (Minn.2004) (-27 (Minn.1985)).
State v. Rohan 834 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Rohan 834 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
than the United States Constitution,” but our courts “ ‘will [not] cavalierly construe our constitution more expansively than the United States Supreme Court has construed the federal constitution.’” -62 (Minn.2004) (-27 (Minn.1985)).
State v. Johnson 831 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Johnson 831 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-63 (Minn.2004) (discussing the circumstances under which Minn. Const, art 1, § 10, provides greater protection than the Fourth Amendment).
State v. Lemert 829 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Lemert 829 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Dickey 827 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Dickey 827 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)
State v. Klamar 823 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Klamar 823 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012
State v. Smith 814 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2012
State v. Smith 814 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2012
Under Minn. Const, art. I, § 10, a traffic stop does not violate the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures as long as “each incremental intrusion during a stop [is] ‘strictly tied to and justified by the circumstances which rendered [the initiation of the stop] permissible.’ ” (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 19 , 88 S.Ct.
State v. Diede 795 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 2011
State v. Diede 795 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 2011
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), a police officer may temporarily detain a suspect without probable cause if (1) “the stop was justified at its inception” by reasonable articulable suspicion, and (2) “the actions of the police during the stop were reasonably related to and justified by the circumstances that gave rise to the stop in the first place.” (citing Terry, 392 U.S. at 19-21 , 88 S.Ct.
Minneapolis Police Department v. Kelly 776 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Minneapolis Police Department v. Kelly 776 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-75 (Minn.2004) (Russell Anderson, J., concurring) (noting that since 1975, rule 6.01 has “been workable and easily applied by officers on the street”).
State v. Krenik 774 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Krenik 774 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Maldonado-Arreaga 772 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Maldonado-Arreaga 772 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Ortega 770 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 2009
State v. Ortega 770 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 2009
State v. Gauster 752 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 2008
State v. Gauster 752 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 2008
State v. Shriner 751 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
State v. Shriner 751 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
“When reviewing a pretrial order on a motion to suppress evidence, we may independently review the facts and determine whether, as a matter of law, the district court erred in suppressing or not suppressing the evidence.”
State v. Timberlake 744 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 2008
State v. Timberlake 744 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 2008
We have held that the “principles and framework of Terry [apply when] evaluating the reasonableness of [searches and] seizures during traffic stops even when a minor law has been violated.” (concluding that “the Terry principles are appropriately applied * * * when a motor vehicle is stopped”).
State v. Jordan 742 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2007
State v. Jackson 742 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 2007
State v. Hussong 739 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Hussong 739 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2007