Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc., 330 N.W.2d 428.

385 citing documents.

Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 652 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2002
* * ⅜ Thus, we have been careful to limit the availability of such damages to “those plaintiffs who prove that emotional injury occurred under circumstances tending to guarantee its genuineness.” Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A., (quoting Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., -38 (Minn. 1983)).
Stead-Bowers v. Langley 636 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Stead-Bowers v. Langley 636 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., -39 (Minn.1983).
Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage Banking 632 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 2001
Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage Banking 632 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 2001
The prima facie case for reprisal consists of: “(1) statutorily-protected conduct by the employee; (2) adverse employment action by the employer; and (3) a causal connection between the two.” Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Benassi v. Back & Neck Pain Clinic, Inc. 629 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Benassi v. Back & Neck Pain Clinic, Inc. 629 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc., (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct.
Cokley v. City of Otsego 623 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Cokley v. City of Otsego 623 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
To establish a prima facie case of retaliatory discharge, the employee must show: “(1) statutorily-protected conduct by the employee; (2) adverse employment action by the employer; and (3) a causal connection between the two.” Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Potter v. Ernst & Young, LLP 622 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Potter v. Ernst & Young, LLP 622 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Jensen v. Walsh 609 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Jensen v. Walsh 609 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., -39 (Minn.1983).
Kuelbs v. Williams 609 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Kuelbs v. Williams 609 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, -39 (Minn.1983).
Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage Banking 605 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage Banking 605 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc.
Kelly v. City of Minneapolis 598 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1999
Kelly v. City of Minneapolis 598 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1999
In Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., we held that the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress requires proof that: (1) the conduct complained of was extreme and outrageous; (2) the conduct was intentional or reckless; (3) the conduct caused emotional distress; (4) and the distress suffered was severe.
Patterson v. Wu Family Corp. 594 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Patterson v. Wu Family Corp. 594 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., -39 (Minn.1983).
Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer Press 589 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1999
Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer Press 589 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1999
See Hubbard v. United Press Inti, Inc., ,, 441 (Minn.1983).
Obst v. Microtron, Inc. 588 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Obst v. Microtron, Inc. 588 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc., (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct.
Pullar v. Independent School District No. 701 582 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Pullar v. Independent School District No. 701 582 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(interpretation of MHRA may apply that of Title VII).
Costilla v. State 571 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Costilla v. State 571 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Burns v. State 570 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Burns v. State 570 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., (causal connec *21 tion may be inferred by adverse employment action following closely after protected conduct).
Wall v. Fair View Hospital & Healthcare Services 568 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wall v. Fair View Hospital & Healthcare Services 568 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Phong Thi Doan v. Medtronic, Inc. 560 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Ferrell v. Cross 557 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1997
Ferrell v. Cross 557 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1997
Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc., -39 (Minn.1983).
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
v. Benson, Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc., -38 (Minn.1983).
Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc. 556 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc. 556 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc.
Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of Bloomington 552 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of Bloomington 552 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Intentional infliction of emotional distress is limited to cases involving “particularly egregious facts.” Those facts must evidence conduct “so atrocious that it passes the boundaries of decency and is utterly intolerable to the civilized community.” (citation omitted).
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
No. 1, , 119 n. 7 (Minn.1991); Hubbard v. United Press Int’l
Singleton v. Christ the Servant Evangelical Lutheran Church 541 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Singleton v. Christ the Servant Evangelical Lutheran Church 541 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, -39 (Minn.1983).
Kalia v. St. Cloud State University 539 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kalia v. St. Cloud State University 539 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(citing Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc., ).
Bilal v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 537 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1995